sukehhh的个人主页 - 老虎社区

sukehhh

sukehhh

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

10关注

5粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-02-22

Nice

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-02-22

Good

U.S. stock-market investors are already betting on an infrastructure spending spree<blockquote>美国股市投资者已经押注基础设施支出热潮</blockquote>

2021-02-22

Nice!!!

2021-02-21

Nice read

Goldman Sachs is joining the robo-investing party — should you?<blockquote>高盛正在加入机器人投资行列——你应该加入吗？</blockquote>

2021-02-21

Nice

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-02-20

Nice

抱歉，原内容已删除

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3575103913694167","uuid":"3575103913694167","gmtCreate":1612009890041,"gmtModify":1613831087086,"name":"sukehhh","pinyin":"sukehhh","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4dddb8308a2c3c9746367f01767eee5e","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":5,"headSize":10,"tweetSize":6,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.06.15","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":360799621,"gmtCreate":1613973941963,"gmtModify":1634551698642,"author":{"id":"3575103913694167","authorId":"3575103913694167","name":"sukehhh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4dddb8308a2c3c9746367f01767eee5e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575103913694167","idStr":"3575103913694167"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/360799621","repostId":"1163958969","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1447,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":360799971,"gmtCreate":1613973908593,"gmtModify":1634551698864,"author":{"id":"3575103913694167","authorId":"3575103913694167","name":"sukehhh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4dddb8308a2c3c9746367f01767eee5e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575103913694167","idStr":"3575103913694167"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/360799971","repostId":"1124857901","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124857901","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1613970854,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124857901?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-22 13:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. stock-market investors are already betting on an infrastructure spending spree<blockquote>美国股市投资者已经押注基础设施支出热潮</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124857901","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Potential tax hikes, inflation worries partly blunt potential upside from infrastructure spending\nIn","content":"<p>Potential tax hikes, inflation worries partly blunt potential upside from infrastructure spending</p><p><blockquote>潜在的增税和通胀担忧部分削弱了基础设施支出的潜在上行空间</blockquote></p><p> Investors are once again factoring in the prospect of a big round of long-term infrastructure spending even as U.S. lawmakers work toward a short-term round of relief that’s expected to come in near President Joe Biden’s $1.9 trillion price tag.</p><p><blockquote>尽管美国立法者正在努力制定一轮短期救助计划，预计将接近总统乔·拜登1.9万亿美元的价格，但投资者再次考虑到了一轮大规模长期基础设施支出的前景。</blockquote></p><p> Analysts have already started to “embed expectations” for infrastructure spending, as evidenced by a 25% surge in projected 2021 earnings for companies in the S&amp;P 500 machinery sub-index since June, as opposed to an average rise or around 6% for companies the broader S&amp;P 500 index, said Mark Hackett, chief of investment research at Nationwide, in an interview.</p><p><blockquote>分析师已经开始“嵌入对基础设施支出的预期”，自6月份以来，标普500机械分类指数中公司的预计2021年盈利飙升了25%，而该指数公司的平均涨幅约为6%。Nationwide投资研究主管Mark Hackett在接受采访时表示，更广泛的标普500指数。</blockquote></p><p> The machinery group, which along with the broader industrials sector is seen as a primary beneficiary of a boost in infrastructure spending, has rallied around 118% from its pandemic lows set last March, versus the S&amp;P 500’s 78% rally. Industrials are up more than 86% from those lows, while materials stocks, which investors also expect to benefit, have bounced 95%.</p><p><blockquote>该机械集团与更广泛的工业部门一起被视为基础设施支出增加的主要受益者，该集团已较去年3月创下的大流行低点上涨约118%，而标普500则上涨了78%。工业股较低点上涨了86%以上，而投资者预计也将受益的材料股已反弹95%。</blockquote></p><p> No doubt, part of those gains are down to other pro-cyclical factors, including vaccine rollouts, falling COVID-19 cases, and two heavy load of near-term fiscal stimulus, Hackett said. At the same time, investors are also aware that infrastructure spending is quite likely to lead to tax increases which could blunt the upside for stocks.</p><p><blockquote>哈克特表示，毫无疑问，这些收益部分归功于其他顺周期因素，包括疫苗的推出、COVID-19病例的下降以及两项大量的近期财政刺激措施。与此同时，投资者也意识到基础设施支出很可能导致增税，这可能会削弱股市的上涨空间。</blockquote></p><p> U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, in a Thursday interview with CNBC, saidtax increases on corporations and high-income individualswould be used to pay for part of Biden’s infrastructure plan. Yellen said there wasn’t yet a cost estimate for an infrastructure plan that’s still being put together.</p><p><blockquote>美国财政部长珍妮特·耶伦周四在接受CNBC采访时表示，对企业和高收入个人的增税将用于支付拜登基础设施计划的部分费用。耶伦表示，尚未对仍在制定的基础设施计划进行成本估算。</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile, companies that already have a “green” or eco-friendly tilt may be poised to benefit most within the sectors and industries likely to reap the benefits of an infrastructure program, said Elizabeth Vermillion, equity analyst at CFRA, in an interview.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，CFRA股票分析师伊丽莎白·弗米利恩(Elizabeth Vermillion)在接受采访时表示，已经倾向于“绿色”或环保的公司可能会在可能从基础设施计划中受益最多。</blockquote></p><p> That includes companies like construction-equipment giant Caterpillar Inc.,which offer a variety of battery electric and alternative-fuel equipment that could be favored as part of a Biden plan. Trucking companies could also benefit as they look to piggyback on the build out of infrastructure for electric vehicles.</p><p><blockquote>这包括建筑设备巨头卡特彼勒公司（Caterpillar Inc.）等公司，该公司提供各种电池电动和替代燃料设备，这些设备可能会成为拜登计划的一部分。卡车运输公司也可能受益，因为他们希望利用电动汽车基础设施的建设。</blockquote></p><p> Companies related to 5G mobile phone infrastructure may also benefit, she said. That includes not only carriers and the companies developing 5G technology, but also industrial companies that will be building towers, putting wires in the ground and building out the grid.</p><p><blockquote>她表示，与5G手机基础设施相关的公司也可能受益。这不仅包括运营商和开发5G技术的公司，还包括将建造铁塔、铺设电线和建设电网的工业公司。</blockquote></p><p> At the same time, investor enthusiasm may be curbed by memories of 2016, when optimism ran rampant for a big infrastructure push after Donald Trump’s election victory. Those efforts came to nothing, with “Infrastructure Week” eventually becoming a political punchline.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，投资者的热情可能会受到2016年记忆的抑制，当时唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)赢得大选后，人们对大规模基础设施建设的乐观情绪甚嚣尘上。这些努力都化为乌有，“基础设施周”最终成为政治笑柄。</blockquote></p><p> Plenty of skepticism remains.</p><p><blockquote>许多怀疑仍然存在。</blockquote></p><p> Part of the political appeal of a large-scale infrastructure package is it’s ability to put people back to work. But if the economy does pick up momentum as vaccine rollouts continue, the resulting fall in unemployment could serve to undercut enthusiasm for infrastructure spending, said Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research, in remarks at a Thursday online seminar hosted by Capital Institutional Services.</p><p><blockquote>大规模基础设施计划的部分政治吸引力在于它能够让人们重返工作岗位。但DataTrek Research联合创始人尼古拉斯·科拉斯(Nicholas Colas)周四在Capital Institutional Services主办的在线研讨会上发表讲话时表示，如果经济确实随着疫苗的继续推出而回升，由此导致的失业率下降可能会削弱基础设施支出的热情。</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile, if a plan is enacted that includes corporate tax hikes that unwind a portion of the Trump cut from 35% to 21%, investors should expect to see the biggest headwinds for utilities and communications stocks, the two biggest beneficiaries of the tax reduction, Hackett said. The third biggest hit would be suffered by industrial companies, blunting some of the upside from the increased spending.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，如果一项包括提高企业税的计划得以实施，将特朗普减税的一部分从35%降至21%，投资者应该会看到公用事业和通信股面临最大的阻力，这是减税的两个最大受益者，哈克特说。工业企业将遭受第三大打击，削弱支出增加带来的部分上行空间。</blockquote></p><p> It isn’t only stock-market investors that are starting to pencil in prospects for more spending on infrastructure, Hackett said. Rising inflation expectations, in part, also reflect that potential as does the related rise in U.S. Treasury debt yields.</p><p><blockquote>哈克特表示，不仅仅是股市投资者开始考虑增加基础设施支出的前景。通胀预期上升在一定程度上也反映了这种潜力，美国国债收益率的相关上升也是如此。</blockquote></p><p> Indeed, while economists at Bank of America said they remained skeptical of inflation prospects around the globe, they see the U.S. as an exception. Big rounds of fiscal spending already in the pipeline and perhaps to come, including up to $2 trillion in infrastructure spending over four years, remain an upside risk to the inflation outlook, wrote Ethan Harris and Aditya Bhave, in a Feb. 5 note.</p><p><blockquote>事实上，尽管美国银行的经济学家表示，他们仍然对全球通胀前景持怀疑态度，但他们认为美国是个例外。伊森·哈里斯(Ethan Harris)和阿迪亚·巴韦(Aditya Bhave)在2月5日的一份报告中写道，已经在酝酿中以及可能即将到来的大规模财政支出，包括四年内高达2万亿美元的基础设施支出，仍然对通胀前景构成上行风险。</blockquote></p><p> The past week saw stocks end mostly lower but not far off all-time highs, with the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;losing 0.7% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;down 1.6%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;eked out a 0.1% weekly gain.</p><p><blockquote>过去一周，股市大多走低，但距离历史高点不远，标普500下跌0.7%，以科技股为主的纳斯达克综合指数下跌1.6%。道琼斯工业平均指数周涨幅为0.1%。</blockquote></p><p> The week ahead will be closely watched for developments on Biden’s $1.9 trillion relief spending plan.</p><p><blockquote>未来一周将密切关注拜登1.9万亿美元救助支出计划的进展。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell will testify in front of lawmakers about monetary policy Tuesday and Wednesday. On the data front, the highlights include a revision of U.S. fourth-quarter gross domestic product data on Thursday, along with weekly figures on unemployment benefit claims and a reading on January durable-goods orders.</p><p><blockquote>美联储主席鲍威尔将于周二和周三在立法者面前就货币政策作证。数据方面，亮点包括周四对美国第四季度国内生产总值数据的修正，以及每周初请失业金数据和1月份耐用品订单数据。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. stock-market investors are already betting on an infrastructure spending spree<blockquote>美国股市投资者已经押注基础设施支出热潮</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. stock-market investors are already betting on an infrastructure spending spree<blockquote>美国股市投资者已经押注基础设施支出热潮</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">MarketWatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-02-22 13:14</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Potential tax hikes, inflation worries partly blunt potential upside from infrastructure spending</p><p><blockquote>潜在的增税和通胀担忧部分削弱了基础设施支出的潜在上行空间</blockquote></p><p> Investors are once again factoring in the prospect of a big round of long-term infrastructure spending even as U.S. lawmakers work toward a short-term round of relief that’s expected to come in near President Joe Biden’s $1.9 trillion price tag.</p><p><blockquote>尽管美国立法者正在努力制定一轮短期救助计划，预计将接近总统乔·拜登1.9万亿美元的价格，但投资者再次考虑到了一轮大规模长期基础设施支出的前景。</blockquote></p><p> Analysts have already started to “embed expectations” for infrastructure spending, as evidenced by a 25% surge in projected 2021 earnings for companies in the S&amp;P 500 machinery sub-index since June, as opposed to an average rise or around 6% for companies the broader S&amp;P 500 index, said Mark Hackett, chief of investment research at Nationwide, in an interview.</p><p><blockquote>分析师已经开始“嵌入对基础设施支出的预期”，自6月份以来，标普500机械分类指数中公司的预计2021年盈利飙升了25%，而该指数公司的平均涨幅约为6%。Nationwide投资研究主管Mark Hackett在接受采访时表示，更广泛的标普500指数。</blockquote></p><p> The machinery group, which along with the broader industrials sector is seen as a primary beneficiary of a boost in infrastructure spending, has rallied around 118% from its pandemic lows set last March, versus the S&amp;P 500’s 78% rally. Industrials are up more than 86% from those lows, while materials stocks, which investors also expect to benefit, have bounced 95%.</p><p><blockquote>该机械集团与更广泛的工业部门一起被视为基础设施支出增加的主要受益者，该集团已较去年3月创下的大流行低点上涨约118%，而标普500则上涨了78%。工业股较低点上涨了86%以上，而投资者预计也将受益的材料股已反弹95%。</blockquote></p><p> No doubt, part of those gains are down to other pro-cyclical factors, including vaccine rollouts, falling COVID-19 cases, and two heavy load of near-term fiscal stimulus, Hackett said. At the same time, investors are also aware that infrastructure spending is quite likely to lead to tax increases which could blunt the upside for stocks.</p><p><blockquote>哈克特表示，毫无疑问，这些收益部分归功于其他顺周期因素，包括疫苗的推出、COVID-19病例的下降以及两项大量的近期财政刺激措施。与此同时，投资者也意识到基础设施支出很可能导致增税，这可能会削弱股市的上涨空间。</blockquote></p><p> U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, in a Thursday interview with CNBC, saidtax increases on corporations and high-income individualswould be used to pay for part of Biden’s infrastructure plan. Yellen said there wasn’t yet a cost estimate for an infrastructure plan that’s still being put together.</p><p><blockquote>美国财政部长珍妮特·耶伦周四在接受CNBC采访时表示，对企业和高收入个人的增税将用于支付拜登基础设施计划的部分费用。耶伦表示，尚未对仍在制定的基础设施计划进行成本估算。</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile, companies that already have a “green” or eco-friendly tilt may be poised to benefit most within the sectors and industries likely to reap the benefits of an infrastructure program, said Elizabeth Vermillion, equity analyst at CFRA, in an interview.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，CFRA股票分析师伊丽莎白·弗米利恩(Elizabeth Vermillion)在接受采访时表示，已经倾向于“绿色”或环保的公司可能会在可能从基础设施计划中受益最多。</blockquote></p><p> That includes companies like construction-equipment giant Caterpillar Inc.,which offer a variety of battery electric and alternative-fuel equipment that could be favored as part of a Biden plan. Trucking companies could also benefit as they look to piggyback on the build out of infrastructure for electric vehicles.</p><p><blockquote>这包括建筑设备巨头卡特彼勒公司（Caterpillar Inc.）等公司，该公司提供各种电池电动和替代燃料设备，这些设备可能会成为拜登计划的一部分。卡车运输公司也可能受益，因为他们希望利用电动汽车基础设施的建设。</blockquote></p><p> Companies related to 5G mobile phone infrastructure may also benefit, she said. That includes not only carriers and the companies developing 5G technology, but also industrial companies that will be building towers, putting wires in the ground and building out the grid.</p><p><blockquote>她表示，与5G手机基础设施相关的公司也可能受益。这不仅包括运营商和开发5G技术的公司，还包括将建造铁塔、铺设电线和建设电网的工业公司。</blockquote></p><p> At the same time, investor enthusiasm may be curbed by memories of 2016, when optimism ran rampant for a big infrastructure push after Donald Trump’s election victory. Those efforts came to nothing, with “Infrastructure Week” eventually becoming a political punchline.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，投资者的热情可能会受到2016年记忆的抑制，当时唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)赢得大选后，人们对大规模基础设施建设的乐观情绪甚嚣尘上。这些努力都化为乌有，“基础设施周”最终成为政治笑柄。</blockquote></p><p> Plenty of skepticism remains.</p><p><blockquote>许多怀疑仍然存在。</blockquote></p><p> Part of the political appeal of a large-scale infrastructure package is it’s ability to put people back to work. But if the economy does pick up momentum as vaccine rollouts continue, the resulting fall in unemployment could serve to undercut enthusiasm for infrastructure spending, said Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research, in remarks at a Thursday online seminar hosted by Capital Institutional Services.</p><p><blockquote>大规模基础设施计划的部分政治吸引力在于它能够让人们重返工作岗位。但DataTrek Research联合创始人尼古拉斯·科拉斯(Nicholas Colas)周四在Capital Institutional Services主办的在线研讨会上发表讲话时表示，如果经济确实随着疫苗的继续推出而回升，由此导致的失业率下降可能会削弱基础设施支出的热情。</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile, if a plan is enacted that includes corporate tax hikes that unwind a portion of the Trump cut from 35% to 21%, investors should expect to see the biggest headwinds for utilities and communications stocks, the two biggest beneficiaries of the tax reduction, Hackett said. The third biggest hit would be suffered by industrial companies, blunting some of the upside from the increased spending.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，如果一项包括提高企业税的计划得以实施，将特朗普减税的一部分从35%降至21%，投资者应该会看到公用事业和通信股面临最大的阻力，这是减税的两个最大受益者，哈克特说。工业企业将遭受第三大打击，削弱支出增加带来的部分上行空间。</blockquote></p><p> It isn’t only stock-market investors that are starting to pencil in prospects for more spending on infrastructure, Hackett said. Rising inflation expectations, in part, also reflect that potential as does the related rise in U.S. Treasury debt yields.</p><p><blockquote>哈克特表示，不仅仅是股市投资者开始考虑增加基础设施支出的前景。通胀预期上升在一定程度上也反映了这种潜力，美国国债收益率的相关上升也是如此。</blockquote></p><p> Indeed, while economists at Bank of America said they remained skeptical of inflation prospects around the globe, they see the U.S. as an exception. Big rounds of fiscal spending already in the pipeline and perhaps to come, including up to $2 trillion in infrastructure spending over four years, remain an upside risk to the inflation outlook, wrote Ethan Harris and Aditya Bhave, in a Feb. 5 note.</p><p><blockquote>事实上，尽管美国银行的经济学家表示，他们仍然对全球通胀前景持怀疑态度，但他们认为美国是个例外。伊森·哈里斯(Ethan Harris)和阿迪亚·巴韦(Aditya Bhave)在2月5日的一份报告中写道，已经在酝酿中以及可能即将到来的大规模财政支出，包括四年内高达2万亿美元的基础设施支出，仍然对通胀前景构成上行风险。</blockquote></p><p> The past week saw stocks end mostly lower but not far off all-time highs, with the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;losing 0.7% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;down 1.6%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;eked out a 0.1% weekly gain.</p><p><blockquote>过去一周，股市大多走低，但距离历史高点不远，标普500下跌0.7%，以科技股为主的纳斯达克综合指数下跌1.6%。道琼斯工业平均指数周涨幅为0.1%。</blockquote></p><p> The week ahead will be closely watched for developments on Biden’s $1.9 trillion relief spending plan.</p><p><blockquote>未来一周将密切关注拜登1.9万亿美元救助支出计划的进展。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell will testify in front of lawmakers about monetary policy Tuesday and Wednesday. On the data front, the highlights include a revision of U.S. fourth-quarter gross domestic product data on Thursday, along with weekly figures on unemployment benefit claims and a reading on January durable-goods orders.</p><p><blockquote>美联储主席鲍威尔将于周二和周三在立法者面前就货币政策作证。数据方面，亮点包括周四对美国第四季度国内生产总值数据的修正，以及每周初请失业金数据和1月份耐用品订单数据。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/u-s-stock-market-investors-are-already-betting-on-an-infrastructure-spending-spree-11613773663?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/u-s-stock-market-investors-are-already-betting-on-an-infrastructure-spending-spree-11613773663?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1124857901","content_text":"Potential tax hikes, inflation worries partly blunt potential upside from infrastructure spending\nInvestors are once again factoring in the prospect of a big round of long-term infrastructure spending even as U.S. lawmakers work toward a short-term round of relief that’s expected to come in near President Joe Biden’s $1.9 trillion price tag.\nAnalysts have already started to “embed expectations” for infrastructure spending, as evidenced by a 25% surge in projected 2021 earnings for companies in the S&P 500 machinery sub-index since June, as opposed to an average rise or around 6% for companies the broader S&P 500 index, said Mark Hackett, chief of investment research at Nationwide, in an interview.\nThe machinery group, which along with the broader industrials sector is seen as a primary beneficiary of a boost in infrastructure spending, has rallied around 118% from its pandemic lows set last March, versus the S&P 500’s 78% rally. Industrials are up more than 86% from those lows, while materials stocks, which investors also expect to benefit, have bounced 95%.\nNo doubt, part of those gains are down to other pro-cyclical factors, including vaccine rollouts, falling COVID-19 cases, and two heavy load of near-term fiscal stimulus, Hackett said. At the same time, investors are also aware that infrastructure spending is quite likely to lead to tax increases which could blunt the upside for stocks.\nU.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, in a Thursday interview with CNBC, saidtax increases on corporations and high-income individualswould be used to pay for part of Biden’s infrastructure plan. Yellen said there wasn’t yet a cost estimate for an infrastructure plan that’s still being put together.\nMeanwhile, companies that already have a “green” or eco-friendly tilt may be poised to benefit most within the sectors and industries likely to reap the benefits of an infrastructure program, said Elizabeth Vermillion, equity analyst at CFRA, in an interview.\nThat includes companies like construction-equipment giant Caterpillar Inc.,which offer a variety of battery electric and alternative-fuel equipment that could be favored as part of a Biden plan. Trucking companies could also benefit as they look to piggyback on the build out of infrastructure for electric vehicles.\nCompanies related to 5G mobile phone infrastructure may also benefit, she said. That includes not only carriers and the companies developing 5G technology, but also industrial companies that will be building towers, putting wires in the ground and building out the grid.\nAt the same time, investor enthusiasm may be curbed by memories of 2016, when optimism ran rampant for a big infrastructure push after Donald Trump’s election victory. Those efforts came to nothing, with “Infrastructure Week” eventually becoming a political punchline.\nPlenty of skepticism remains.\nPart of the political appeal of a large-scale infrastructure package is it’s ability to put people back to work. But if the economy does pick up momentum as vaccine rollouts continue, the resulting fall in unemployment could serve to undercut enthusiasm for infrastructure spending, said Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research, in remarks at a Thursday online seminar hosted by Capital Institutional Services.\nMeanwhile, if a plan is enacted that includes corporate tax hikes that unwind a portion of the Trump cut from 35% to 21%, investors should expect to see the biggest headwinds for utilities and communications stocks, the two biggest beneficiaries of the tax reduction, Hackett said. The third biggest hit would be suffered by industrial companies, blunting some of the upside from the increased spending.\nIt isn’t only stock-market investors that are starting to pencil in prospects for more spending on infrastructure, Hackett said. Rising inflation expectations, in part, also reflect that potential as does the related rise in U.S. Treasury debt yields.\nIndeed, while economists at Bank of America said they remained skeptical of inflation prospects around the globe, they see the U.S. as an exception. Big rounds of fiscal spending already in the pipeline and perhaps to come, including up to $2 trillion in infrastructure spending over four years, remain an upside risk to the inflation outlook, wrote Ethan Harris and Aditya Bhave, in a Feb. 5 note.\nThe past week saw stocks end mostly lower but not far off all-time highs, with the S&P 500 losing 0.7% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite down 1.6%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average eked out a 0.1% weekly gain.\nThe week ahead will be closely watched for developments on Biden’s $1.9 trillion relief spending plan.\nFederal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell will testify in front of lawmakers about monetary policy Tuesday and Wednesday. On the data front, the highlights include a revision of U.S. fourth-quarter gross domestic product data on Thursday, along with weekly figures on unemployment benefit claims and a reading on January durable-goods orders.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2452,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":360790227,"gmtCreate":1613973857169,"gmtModify":1634551699343,"author":{"id":"3575103913694167","authorId":"3575103913694167","name":"sukehhh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4dddb8308a2c3c9746367f01767eee5e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575103913694167","idStr":"3575103913694167"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice!!!","listText":"Nice!!!","text":"Nice!!!","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9aa473aec50c41a28e5963c7bcecea88","width":"750","height":"1654"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/360790227","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1530,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":360171077,"gmtCreate":1613877317199,"gmtModify":1634551994255,"author":{"id":"3575103913694167","authorId":"3575103913694167","name":"sukehhh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4dddb8308a2c3c9746367f01767eee5e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575103913694167","idStr":"3575103913694167"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice read","listText":"Nice read","text":"Nice read","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/360171077","repostId":"1161529893","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1161529893","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1613733842,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1161529893?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-19 19:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Goldman Sachs is joining the robo-investing party — should you?<blockquote>高盛正在加入机器人投资行列——你应该加入吗？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1161529893","media":"Marketwatch","summary":"‘Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.Robo investing has become increasingly ubiquitous on practically every brokerage platform. Until Tuesday, Goldman Sachs GS, -0.91% restricted its robo-advisory service, Marcus, to people who had at least $10 million to invest.Now anyone with at least $1,000 to invest in can access the same trading algorithms that have been used by so","content":"<p>  ‘Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.  Robo investing has become increasingly ubiquitous on practically every brokerage platform. Until Tuesday, Goldman Sachs GS, -0.91% restricted its robo-advisory service, Marcus, to people who had at least $10 million to invest.</p><p><blockquote>加州圣地亚哥的财务顾问万斯·巴斯说，就像在拉斯维加斯一样，众议院通常会获胜。他经营着一家名为Your Dedicated Fiduciary的公司。机器人投资在几乎每个经纪平台上都变得越来越普遍。直到周二，高盛GS(-0.91%)将其机器人咨询服务Marcus限制为至少有1000万美元可投资的人。</blockquote></p><p> Now anyone with at least $1,000 to invest in can access the same trading algorithms that have been used by some of Goldman Sachs’ wealthiest clients for a 0.35% annual advisory fee. But investing experts say there are more costs to consider before jumping on the robo-investing train.</p><p><blockquote>现在，任何拥有至少1,000美元可投资的人都可以使用高盛一些最富有的客户使用的相同交易算法，每年只需支付0.35%的咨询费。但投资专家表示，在跳上机器人投资列车之前，需要考虑更多成本。</blockquote></p><p> “Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.</p><p><blockquote>“就像在拉斯维加斯一样，众议院通常会获胜，”加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥的财务顾问万斯·巴斯(Vance Barse)说，他经营着一家名为Your Dedicated Fiduciary的公司。</blockquote></p><p> Although the 35 basis-point price tag is a “loss leader” to Goldman Sachs, he said companies typically make such offers in order to attract clients to cross-sell them banking products.</p><p><blockquote>尽管35个基点的价格标签对高盛来说是一个“亏损领头羊”，但他表示，公司通常会提出这样的报价，以吸引客户向他们交叉销售银行产品。</blockquote></p><p> “People forget that banks are ultimately in the business of making money,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>“人们忘记了银行最终是为了赚钱，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Goldman Sachs declined to comment.</p><p><blockquote>高盛拒绝置评。</blockquote></p><p> The company is among other major financial-services firms offering digital advisers, including Vanguard, Fidelity and Schwab SCHW, +1.03% and startups such as Betterment and Wealthfront.</p><p><blockquote>该公司是其他提供数字顾问的主要金融服务公司之一，包括Vanguard、Fidelity和Schwab SCHW，+1.03%，以及Betterment和Wealthfront等初创公司。</blockquote></p><p> Fees for robo advisers can start at around 0.25%, and increase to 1% and above for traditional brokers. A survey of nearly 1,000 financial planners by Inside Information, a trade publication, found that the bigger the portfolio, the lower the percentage clients paid in fees.</p><p><blockquote>机器人顾问的费用从0.25%左右开始，传统经纪商的费用会增加到1%及以上。行业出版物Inside Information对近1,000名理财规划师进行的一项调查发现，投资组合越大，客户支付的费用比例就越低。</blockquote></p><p> The median annual charge hovered at around 1% for portfolios of $1 million or less, and 0.5% for portfolios worth $5 million to $10 million.</p><p><blockquote>对于100万美元或以下的投资组合，年费中位数徘徊在1%左右，对于价值500万至1000万美元的投资组合，年费中位数徘徊在0.5%左右。</blockquote></p><p> Robo advisers like those on offer from Goldman Sachs and Betterment differ from robo platforms like Robinhood. The former suggest portfolios focused on exchange-traded funds, while Robinhood allows users to invest in individual ETFs, stocks, options and even cryptocurrencies.</p><p><blockquote>高盛和Betterment提供的机器人顾问与Robinhood等机器人平台不同。前者建议投资组合专注于交易所交易基金，而Robinhood允许用户投资个人ETF、股票、期权甚至加密货币。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Robo investing as a self-driving car</b></p><p><blockquote><b>机器人投资作为自动驾驶汽车</b></blockquote></p><p> Consumers have turned to robo-investing at unprecedented levels during the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>在疫情期间，消费者以前所未有的水平转向机器人投资。</blockquote></p><p> The rate of new accounts opened jumped between 50% and 300% during the first quarter of 2020 compared to the fourth quarter of last year, according to a May report published by research and advisory firm Aite Group.</p><p><blockquote>根据研究和咨询公司艾特集团5月份发布的一份报告，与去年第四季度相比，2020年第一季度的新开户率跃升了50%至300%。</blockquote></p><p> So what is rob-investing? Think of it like a self-driving car.</p><p><blockquote>那么什么是rob投资呢？把它想象成一辆自动驾驶汽车。</blockquote></p><p> You put in your destination, buckle up in the backseat and your driver (robo adviser) will get there. You, the passenger, can’t easily slam the breaks if you fear your driver is leading you in the wrong direction. Nor can you put your foot on the gas pedal if you’re in a rush and want to get to your destination faster.</p><p><blockquote>你输入你的目的地，在后座系好安全带，你的司机（机器人顾问）就会到达那里。作为乘客，如果你担心你的司机把你引向错误的方向，你就不能轻易刹车。如果您赶时间并想更快地到达目的地，也不能踩油门。</blockquote></p><p> Robo-investing platforms use advanced-trading algorithm software to design investment portfolios based on factors such as an individual’s appetite for risk-taking and desired short-term and long-term returns.</p><p><blockquote>机器人投资平台使用先进的交易算法软件，根据个人的风险偏好以及期望的短期和长期回报等因素来设计投资组合。</blockquote></p><p> There are over 200 platforms that provide these services charging typically no more than a 0.5% annual advisory fee, compared to the 1% annual fee human investment advisors charge.</p><p><blockquote>有200多个平台提供这些服务，每年收取的咨询费通常不超过0.5%，而人力投资顾问收取的年费为1%。</blockquote></p><p> And rather than investing entirely on your own, which can become a second job and lead to emotional investment decisions, robo advisers handle buying and selling assets.</p><p><blockquote>机器人顾问处理资产的买卖，而不是完全自己投资，这可能成为第二份工作并导致情绪化的投资决策。</blockquote></p><p> Cynthia Loh, Schwab vice president of Digital Advice and Innovation, disagrees, and argues that robo investing doesn’t mean giving technology control of your money. Schwab, she said, has a team of investment experts who oversee investment strategy and keep watch during periods of market volatility, although some services have more input from humans than others.</p><p><blockquote>嘉信理财数字咨询和创新副总裁辛西娅·洛(Cynthia Loh)不同意这种观点，她认为机器人投资并不意味着让技术控制你的资金。她说，嘉信理财拥有一支投资专家团队，负责监督投资策略并在市场波动期间进行监控，尽管有些服务比其他服务有更多的人工输入。</blockquote></p><p> As she recently wrote on MarketWatch: “One common misconception about automated investing is that choosing a robo adviser essentially means handing control of your money over to robots. The truth is that robo solutions have a combination of automated and human components running things behind the scenes.”</p><p><blockquote>正如她最近在MarketWatch上所写：“关于自动化投资的一个常见误解是，选择机器人顾问本质上意味着将资金的控制权交给机器人。事实是，机器人解决方案结合了自动化和人工组件，在幕后运行事物。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>Robos appeal to inexperienced investors</b></p><p><blockquote><b>机器人吸引缺乏经验的投资者</b></blockquote></p><p> Robo investing tends to appeal to inexperienced investors or ones who don’t have the time or energy to manage their own portfolios. These investors can take comfort in the “set it and forget it approach to investing and overtime let the markets do their thing,” Barse said.</p><p><blockquote>机器人投资往往吸引缺乏经验的投资者或没有时间或精力管理自己投资组合的投资者。巴尔斯说，这些投资者可以对“一劳永逸”的投资方法感到放心，随着时间的推移，让市场做自己的事情”。</blockquote></p><p> That makes it much easier to stomach market volatility knowing that you don’t necessarily have to make spur-of-the-moment decisions to buy or sell assets, said Tiffany Lam-Balfour, an investing and retirement specialist at NerdWallet.</p><p><blockquote>NerdWallet的投资和退休专家蒂芙尼·拉姆-贝尔福(Tiffany Lam-Balfour)表示，这使得你更容易承受市场波动，因为你不一定必须做出购买或出售资产的冲动决定。</blockquote></p><p> “When you’re investing, you don’t want to keep looking at the market and going ‘Oh I need to get out of this,’” she said. “You want to leave it to the professionals to get you through it because they know what your time horizon is, and they’ll adjust your portfolio automatically for you.”</p><p><blockquote>“当你投资时，你不会想一直关注市场并说‘哦，我需要摆脱困境’，”她说。“你想让专业人士来帮你度过难关，因为他们知道你的时间范围，他们会自动为你调整你的投资组合。”</blockquote></p><p></p><p> That said, “you can’t just expect your investments will only go up. Even if you had the world’s best human financial adviser you can’t expect that.”</p><p><blockquote>也就是说，“你不能指望你的投资只会上涨。即使你有世界上最好的人类财务顾问，你也不能指望这一点。”</blockquote></p><p> Others disagree, and say robo advisers appeal to older investors. “Planning for and paying yourself in retirement is complex. There are many options out there to help investors through it, and robo investing is one of them,” Loh said.</p><p><blockquote>其他人不同意，并表示机器人顾问对老年投资者有吸引力。“退休后的规划和支付费用很复杂。有很多选择可以帮助投资者度过难关，机器人投资就是其中之一，”Loh说。</blockquote></p><p> “Many thoughtful, long-term investors have discovered that they want a more modern, streamlined, and inexpensive way to invest, and robo investing fits the bill. They are happy to let technology handle the mundane activities that are harder and more time-consuming for investors to do themselves,” she added.</p><p><blockquote>“许多深思熟虑的长期投资者发现，他们想要一种更现代、更简化、更便宜的投资方式，而机器人投资正好符合这一要求。他们很乐意让技术来处理更困难、更耗时的日常活动。投资者自己做，”她补充道。</blockquote></p><p> <b>There is often no door to knock on</b></p><p><blockquote><b>常常无门可敲</b></blockquote></p><p> Your robo adviser only knows what you tell it. The simplistic questionnaire you’re required to fill out will on most robo-investing platforms will collect information on your annual income, desired age to retire and the level of risk you’re willing to take on.</p><p><blockquote>你的机器人顾问只知道你告诉它什么。大多数机器人投资平台上要求您填写的简单问卷将收集有关您的年收入、期望退休年龄以及您愿意承担的风险水平的信息。</blockquote></p><p> It won’t however know if you just had a child and would like to begin saving for their education down the road or if you recently lost your job.</p><p><blockquote>然而，它不会知道你是否刚刚有了一个孩子，并想开始为他们的教育存钱，或者你是否最近失业了。</blockquote></p><p> “The question then becomes to whom does that person go to for advice and does that platform offer that and if so, to what level of complexity?” said Barse.</p><p><blockquote>“那么问题就变成了那个人向谁寻求建议？该平台是否提供建议？如果提供，复杂程度如何？”巴斯说。</blockquote></p><p> Not all platforms give individualized investment advice and the hybrid models that do offer advice from a human tend to charge higher annual fees.</p><p><blockquote>并非所有平台都提供个性化投资建议，提供人工建议的混合模式往往会收取更高的年费。</blockquote></p><p> Additionally, a robo adviser won’t necessarily “manage your money with tax efficiency at front of mind,” said Roger Ma, a certified financial planner at Lifelaidout, a New York City-based financial advisory group.</p><p><blockquote>此外，纽约市财务咨询集团Lifelaidout的注册财务规划师罗杰·马(Roger Ma)表示，机器人顾问不一定“在管理资金时首先考虑税收效率”。</blockquote></p><p> For instance, one common way investors offset the taxes they pay on long-term investments is by selling assets that have accrued losses. Traditional advisers often specialize in constructing portfolios that lead to the most tax-efficient outcomes, said Ma, who is the author of “Work Your Money, Not Your Life”.</p><p><blockquote>例如，投资者抵消长期投资税款的一种常见方式是出售已累计亏损的资产。《工作你的钱，而不是你的生活》一书的作者马说，传统顾问通常专注于构建能带来最节税结果的投资组合。</blockquote></p><p> But with robo investing, the trades that are made for you are the same ones that are being made for a slew of other investors who may fall under a different tax-bracket than you.</p><p><blockquote>但通过机器人投资，为您进行的交易与为许多其他投资者进行的交易是相同的，这些投资者可能属于与您不同的税级。</blockquote></p><p> On top of that, while robo investing may feel like a simplistic way to get into investing, especially for beginners it can “overcomplicate investing,” Ma said.</p><p><blockquote>最重要的是，虽然机器人投资可能感觉像是一种简单的投资方式，特别是对于初学者来说，它可能会“使投资过于复杂”，马云说。</blockquote></p><p> “If you are just looking to dip your toe in and you want to feel like you’re invested in a diversified portfolio, I wouldn’t say definitely don’t do a robo adviser,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>“如果你只是想尝试一下，并且想感觉自己投资于多元化的投资组合，我不会说绝对不要聘请机器人顾问，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Don’t rule out investing through a target-date fund that selects a single fund to invest in and adjusts the position over time based on their investment goals, he added.</p><p><blockquote>他补充说，不要排除通过目标日期基金进行投资，该基金选择单一基金进行投资，并根据投资目标随着时间的推移调整头寸。</blockquote></p><p> But not everyone can tell the difference between robo advice and advice from a human being. In 2015, MarketWatch asked four prominent robo advisers and four of the traditional, flesh-and-blood variety to construct portfolios for a hypothetical 35-year-old investor with $40,000 to invest.</p><p><blockquote>但并不是每个人都能区分机器人的建议和人类的建议。2015年，MarketWatch请四位著名的机器人顾问和四位传统的有血有肉的机器人顾问为一位假设的35岁投资者构建投资组合，投资金额为40,000美元。</blockquote></p><p> The results were, perhaps, surprising for critics of robo advisers. The robots’ suggestions were “not massively different” from what the human advisers proposed, said Michael Kitces, Pinnacle Advisory Group’s research director, after reviewing the results.</p><p><blockquote>对于机器人顾问的批评者来说，结果或许令人惊讶。Pinnacle Advisory Group的研究总监Michael Kitces在审查结果后表示，机器人的建议与人类顾问的建议“没有太大不同”。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Sachs is joining the robo-investing party — should you?<blockquote>高盛正在加入机器人投资行列——你应该加入吗？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Sachs is joining the robo-investing party — should you?<blockquote>高盛正在加入机器人投资行列——你应该加入吗？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Marketwatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-02-19 19:24</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>  ‘Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.  Robo investing has become increasingly ubiquitous on practically every brokerage platform. Until Tuesday, Goldman Sachs GS, -0.91% restricted its robo-advisory service, Marcus, to people who had at least $10 million to invest.</p><p><blockquote>加州圣地亚哥的财务顾问万斯·巴斯说，就像在拉斯维加斯一样，众议院通常会获胜。他经营着一家名为Your Dedicated Fiduciary的公司。机器人投资在几乎每个经纪平台上都变得越来越普遍。直到周二，高盛GS(-0.91%)将其机器人咨询服务Marcus限制为至少有1000万美元可投资的人。</blockquote></p><p> Now anyone with at least $1,000 to invest in can access the same trading algorithms that have been used by some of Goldman Sachs’ wealthiest clients for a 0.35% annual advisory fee. But investing experts say there are more costs to consider before jumping on the robo-investing train.</p><p><blockquote>现在，任何拥有至少1,000美元可投资的人都可以使用高盛一些最富有的客户使用的相同交易算法，每年只需支付0.35%的咨询费。但投资专家表示，在跳上机器人投资列车之前，需要考虑更多成本。</blockquote></p><p> “Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.</p><p><blockquote>“就像在拉斯维加斯一样，众议院通常会获胜，”加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥的财务顾问万斯·巴斯(Vance Barse)说，他经营着一家名为Your Dedicated Fiduciary的公司。</blockquote></p><p> Although the 35 basis-point price tag is a “loss leader” to Goldman Sachs, he said companies typically make such offers in order to attract clients to cross-sell them banking products.</p><p><blockquote>尽管35个基点的价格标签对高盛来说是一个“亏损领头羊”，但他表示，公司通常会提出这样的报价，以吸引客户向他们交叉销售银行产品。</blockquote></p><p> “People forget that banks are ultimately in the business of making money,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>“人们忘记了银行最终是为了赚钱，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Goldman Sachs declined to comment.</p><p><blockquote>高盛拒绝置评。</blockquote></p><p> The company is among other major financial-services firms offering digital advisers, including Vanguard, Fidelity and Schwab SCHW, +1.03% and startups such as Betterment and Wealthfront.</p><p><blockquote>该公司是其他提供数字顾问的主要金融服务公司之一，包括Vanguard、Fidelity和Schwab SCHW，+1.03%，以及Betterment和Wealthfront等初创公司。</blockquote></p><p> Fees for robo advisers can start at around 0.25%, and increase to 1% and above for traditional brokers. A survey of nearly 1,000 financial planners by Inside Information, a trade publication, found that the bigger the portfolio, the lower the percentage clients paid in fees.</p><p><blockquote>机器人顾问的费用从0.25%左右开始，传统经纪商的费用会增加到1%及以上。行业出版物Inside Information对近1,000名理财规划师进行的一项调查发现，投资组合越大，客户支付的费用比例就越低。</blockquote></p><p> The median annual charge hovered at around 1% for portfolios of $1 million or less, and 0.5% for portfolios worth $5 million to $10 million.</p><p><blockquote>对于100万美元或以下的投资组合，年费中位数徘徊在1%左右，对于价值500万至1000万美元的投资组合，年费中位数徘徊在0.5%左右。</blockquote></p><p> Robo advisers like those on offer from Goldman Sachs and Betterment differ from robo platforms like Robinhood. The former suggest portfolios focused on exchange-traded funds, while Robinhood allows users to invest in individual ETFs, stocks, options and even cryptocurrencies.</p><p><blockquote>高盛和Betterment提供的机器人顾问与Robinhood等机器人平台不同。前者建议投资组合专注于交易所交易基金，而Robinhood允许用户投资个人ETF、股票、期权甚至加密货币。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Robo investing as a self-driving car</b></p><p><blockquote><b>机器人投资作为自动驾驶汽车</b></blockquote></p><p> Consumers have turned to robo-investing at unprecedented levels during the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>在疫情期间，消费者以前所未有的水平转向机器人投资。</blockquote></p><p> The rate of new accounts opened jumped between 50% and 300% during the first quarter of 2020 compared to the fourth quarter of last year, according to a May report published by research and advisory firm Aite Group.</p><p><blockquote>根据研究和咨询公司艾特集团5月份发布的一份报告，与去年第四季度相比，2020年第一季度的新开户率跃升了50%至300%。</blockquote></p><p> So what is rob-investing? Think of it like a self-driving car.</p><p><blockquote>那么什么是rob投资呢？把它想象成一辆自动驾驶汽车。</blockquote></p><p> You put in your destination, buckle up in the backseat and your driver (robo adviser) will get there. You, the passenger, can’t easily slam the breaks if you fear your driver is leading you in the wrong direction. Nor can you put your foot on the gas pedal if you’re in a rush and want to get to your destination faster.</p><p><blockquote>你输入你的目的地，在后座系好安全带，你的司机（机器人顾问）就会到达那里。作为乘客，如果你担心你的司机把你引向错误的方向，你就不能轻易刹车。如果您赶时间并想更快地到达目的地，也不能踩油门。</blockquote></p><p> Robo-investing platforms use advanced-trading algorithm software to design investment portfolios based on factors such as an individual’s appetite for risk-taking and desired short-term and long-term returns.</p><p><blockquote>机器人投资平台使用先进的交易算法软件，根据个人的风险偏好以及期望的短期和长期回报等因素来设计投资组合。</blockquote></p><p> There are over 200 platforms that provide these services charging typically no more than a 0.5% annual advisory fee, compared to the 1% annual fee human investment advisors charge.</p><p><blockquote>有200多个平台提供这些服务，每年收取的咨询费通常不超过0.5%，而人力投资顾问收取的年费为1%。</blockquote></p><p> And rather than investing entirely on your own, which can become a second job and lead to emotional investment decisions, robo advisers handle buying and selling assets.</p><p><blockquote>机器人顾问处理资产的买卖，而不是完全自己投资，这可能成为第二份工作并导致情绪化的投资决策。</blockquote></p><p> Cynthia Loh, Schwab vice president of Digital Advice and Innovation, disagrees, and argues that robo investing doesn’t mean giving technology control of your money. Schwab, she said, has a team of investment experts who oversee investment strategy and keep watch during periods of market volatility, although some services have more input from humans than others.</p><p><blockquote>嘉信理财数字咨询和创新副总裁辛西娅·洛(Cynthia Loh)不同意这种观点，她认为机器人投资并不意味着让技术控制你的资金。她说，嘉信理财拥有一支投资专家团队，负责监督投资策略并在市场波动期间进行监控，尽管有些服务比其他服务有更多的人工输入。</blockquote></p><p> As she recently wrote on MarketWatch: “One common misconception about automated investing is that choosing a robo adviser essentially means handing control of your money over to robots. The truth is that robo solutions have a combination of automated and human components running things behind the scenes.”</p><p><blockquote>正如她最近在MarketWatch上所写：“关于自动化投资的一个常见误解是，选择机器人顾问本质上意味着将资金的控制权交给机器人。事实是，机器人解决方案结合了自动化和人工组件，在幕后运行事物。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>Robos appeal to inexperienced investors</b></p><p><blockquote><b>机器人吸引缺乏经验的投资者</b></blockquote></p><p> Robo investing tends to appeal to inexperienced investors or ones who don’t have the time or energy to manage their own portfolios. These investors can take comfort in the “set it and forget it approach to investing and overtime let the markets do their thing,” Barse said.</p><p><blockquote>机器人投资往往吸引缺乏经验的投资者或没有时间或精力管理自己投资组合的投资者。巴尔斯说，这些投资者可以对“一劳永逸”的投资方法感到放心，随着时间的推移，让市场做自己的事情”。</blockquote></p><p> That makes it much easier to stomach market volatility knowing that you don’t necessarily have to make spur-of-the-moment decisions to buy or sell assets, said Tiffany Lam-Balfour, an investing and retirement specialist at NerdWallet.</p><p><blockquote>NerdWallet的投资和退休专家蒂芙尼·拉姆-贝尔福(Tiffany Lam-Balfour)表示，这使得你更容易承受市场波动，因为你不一定必须做出购买或出售资产的冲动决定。</blockquote></p><p> “When you’re investing, you don’t want to keep looking at the market and going ‘Oh I need to get out of this,’” she said. “You want to leave it to the professionals to get you through it because they know what your time horizon is, and they’ll adjust your portfolio automatically for you.”</p><p><blockquote>“当你投资时，你不会想一直关注市场并说‘哦，我需要摆脱困境’，”她说。“你想让专业人士来帮你度过难关，因为他们知道你的时间范围，他们会自动为你调整你的投资组合。”</blockquote></p><p></p><p> That said, “you can’t just expect your investments will only go up. Even if you had the world’s best human financial adviser you can’t expect that.”</p><p><blockquote>也就是说，“你不能指望你的投资只会上涨。即使你有世界上最好的人类财务顾问，你也不能指望这一点。”</blockquote></p><p> Others disagree, and say robo advisers appeal to older investors. “Planning for and paying yourself in retirement is complex. There are many options out there to help investors through it, and robo investing is one of them,” Loh said.</p><p><blockquote>其他人不同意，并表示机器人顾问对老年投资者有吸引力。“退休后的规划和支付费用很复杂。有很多选择可以帮助投资者度过难关，机器人投资就是其中之一，”Loh说。</blockquote></p><p> “Many thoughtful, long-term investors have discovered that they want a more modern, streamlined, and inexpensive way to invest, and robo investing fits the bill. They are happy to let technology handle the mundane activities that are harder and more time-consuming for investors to do themselves,” she added.</p><p><blockquote>“许多深思熟虑的长期投资者发现，他们想要一种更现代、更简化、更便宜的投资方式，而机器人投资正好符合这一要求。他们很乐意让技术来处理更困难、更耗时的日常活动。投资者自己做，”她补充道。</blockquote></p><p> <b>There is often no door to knock on</b></p><p><blockquote><b>常常无门可敲</b></blockquote></p><p> Your robo adviser only knows what you tell it. The simplistic questionnaire you’re required to fill out will on most robo-investing platforms will collect information on your annual income, desired age to retire and the level of risk you’re willing to take on.</p><p><blockquote>你的机器人顾问只知道你告诉它什么。大多数机器人投资平台上要求您填写的简单问卷将收集有关您的年收入、期望退休年龄以及您愿意承担的风险水平的信息。</blockquote></p><p> It won’t however know if you just had a child and would like to begin saving for their education down the road or if you recently lost your job.</p><p><blockquote>然而，它不会知道你是否刚刚有了一个孩子，并想开始为他们的教育存钱，或者你是否最近失业了。</blockquote></p><p> “The question then becomes to whom does that person go to for advice and does that platform offer that and if so, to what level of complexity?” said Barse.</p><p><blockquote>“那么问题就变成了那个人向谁寻求建议？该平台是否提供建议？如果提供，复杂程度如何？”巴斯说。</blockquote></p><p> Not all platforms give individualized investment advice and the hybrid models that do offer advice from a human tend to charge higher annual fees.</p><p><blockquote>并非所有平台都提供个性化投资建议，提供人工建议的混合模式往往会收取更高的年费。</blockquote></p><p> Additionally, a robo adviser won’t necessarily “manage your money with tax efficiency at front of mind,” said Roger Ma, a certified financial planner at Lifelaidout, a New York City-based financial advisory group.</p><p><blockquote>此外，纽约市财务咨询集团Lifelaidout的注册财务规划师罗杰·马(Roger Ma)表示，机器人顾问不一定“在管理资金时首先考虑税收效率”。</blockquote></p><p> For instance, one common way investors offset the taxes they pay on long-term investments is by selling assets that have accrued losses. Traditional advisers often specialize in constructing portfolios that lead to the most tax-efficient outcomes, said Ma, who is the author of “Work Your Money, Not Your Life”.</p><p><blockquote>例如，投资者抵消长期投资税款的一种常见方式是出售已累计亏损的资产。《工作你的钱，而不是你的生活》一书的作者马说，传统顾问通常专注于构建能带来最节税结果的投资组合。</blockquote></p><p> But with robo investing, the trades that are made for you are the same ones that are being made for a slew of other investors who may fall under a different tax-bracket than you.</p><p><blockquote>但通过机器人投资，为您进行的交易与为许多其他投资者进行的交易是相同的，这些投资者可能属于与您不同的税级。</blockquote></p><p> On top of that, while robo investing may feel like a simplistic way to get into investing, especially for beginners it can “overcomplicate investing,” Ma said.</p><p><blockquote>最重要的是，虽然机器人投资可能感觉像是一种简单的投资方式，特别是对于初学者来说，它可能会“使投资过于复杂”，马云说。</blockquote></p><p> “If you are just looking to dip your toe in and you want to feel like you’re invested in a diversified portfolio, I wouldn’t say definitely don’t do a robo adviser,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>“如果你只是想尝试一下，并且想感觉自己投资于多元化的投资组合，我不会说绝对不要聘请机器人顾问，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Don’t rule out investing through a target-date fund that selects a single fund to invest in and adjusts the position over time based on their investment goals, he added.</p><p><blockquote>他补充说，不要排除通过目标日期基金进行投资，该基金选择单一基金进行投资，并根据投资目标随着时间的推移调整头寸。</blockquote></p><p> But not everyone can tell the difference between robo advice and advice from a human being. In 2015, MarketWatch asked four prominent robo advisers and four of the traditional, flesh-and-blood variety to construct portfolios for a hypothetical 35-year-old investor with $40,000 to invest.</p><p><blockquote>但并不是每个人都能区分机器人的建议和人类的建议。2015年，MarketWatch请四位著名的机器人顾问和四位传统的有血有肉的机器人顾问为一位假设的35岁投资者构建投资组合，投资金额为40,000美元。</blockquote></p><p> The results were, perhaps, surprising for critics of robo advisers. The robots’ suggestions were “not massively different” from what the human advisers proposed, said Michael Kitces, Pinnacle Advisory Group’s research director, after reviewing the results.</p><p><blockquote>对于机器人顾问的批评者来说，结果或许令人惊讶。Pinnacle Advisory Group的研究总监Michael Kitces在审查结果后表示，机器人的建议与人类顾问的建议“没有太大不同”。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/goldman-sachs-is-joining-the-robo-investing-party-should-you-11613658128?mod=home-page\">Marketwatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/goldman-sachs-is-joining-the-robo-investing-party-should-you-11613658128?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1161529893","content_text":"‘Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.\n\nRobo investing has become increasingly ubiquitous on practically every brokerage platform. Until Tuesday, Goldman Sachs GS, -0.91% restricted its robo-advisory service, Marcus, to people who had at least $10 million to invest.\nNow anyone with at least $1,000 to invest in can access the same trading algorithms that have been used by some of Goldman Sachs’ wealthiest clients for a 0.35% annual advisory fee. But investing experts say there are more costs to consider before jumping on the robo-investing train.\n“Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.\nAlthough the 35 basis-point price tag is a “loss leader” to Goldman Sachs, he said companies typically make such offers in order to attract clients to cross-sell them banking products.\n“People forget that banks are ultimately in the business of making money,” he said.\nGoldman Sachs declined to comment.\nThe company is among other major financial-services firms offering digital advisers, including Vanguard, Fidelity and Schwab SCHW, +1.03% and startups such as Betterment and Wealthfront.\nFees for robo advisers can start at around 0.25%, and increase to 1% and above for traditional brokers. A survey of nearly 1,000 financial planners by Inside Information, a trade publication, found that the bigger the portfolio, the lower the percentage clients paid in fees.\nThe median annual charge hovered at around 1% for portfolios of $1 million or less, and 0.5% for portfolios worth $5 million to $10 million.\nRobo advisers like those on offer from Goldman Sachs and Betterment differ from robo platforms like Robinhood. The former suggest portfolios focused on exchange-traded funds, while Robinhood allows users to invest in individual ETFs, stocks, options and even cryptocurrencies.\nRobo investing as a self-driving car\nConsumers have turned to robo-investing at unprecedented levels during the pandemic.\nThe rate of new accounts opened jumped between 50% and 300% during the first quarter of 2020 compared to the fourth quarter of last year, according to a May report published by research and advisory firm Aite Group.\nSo what is rob-investing? Think of it like a self-driving car.\nYou put in your destination, buckle up in the backseat and your driver (robo adviser) will get there. You, the passenger, can’t easily slam the breaks if you fear your driver is leading you in the wrong direction. Nor can you put your foot on the gas pedal if you’re in a rush and want to get to your destination faster.\nRobo-investing platforms use advanced-trading algorithm software to design investment portfolios based on factors such as an individual’s appetite for risk-taking and desired short-term and long-term returns.\nThere are over 200 platforms that provide these services charging typically no more than a 0.5% annual advisory fee, compared to the 1% annual fee human investment advisors charge.\nAnd rather than investing entirely on your own, which can become a second job and lead to emotional investment decisions, robo advisers handle buying and selling assets.\nCynthia Loh, Schwab vice president of Digital Advice and Innovation, disagrees, and argues that robo investing doesn’t mean giving technology control of your money. Schwab, she said, has a team of investment experts who oversee investment strategy and keep watch during periods of market volatility, although some services have more input from humans than others.\nAs she recently wrote on MarketWatch: “One common misconception about automated investing is that choosing a robo adviser essentially means handing control of your money over to robots. The truth is that robo solutions have a combination of automated and human components running things behind the scenes.”\nRobos appeal to inexperienced investors\nRobo investing tends to appeal to inexperienced investors or ones who don’t have the time or energy to manage their own portfolios. These investors can take comfort in the “set it and forget it approach to investing and overtime let the markets do their thing,” Barse said.\nThat makes it much easier to stomach market volatility knowing that you don’t necessarily have to make spur-of-the-moment decisions to buy or sell assets, said Tiffany Lam-Balfour, an investing and retirement specialist at NerdWallet.\n“When you’re investing, you don’t want to keep looking at the market and going ‘Oh I need to get out of this,’” she said. “You want to leave it to the professionals to get you through it because they know what your time horizon is, and they’ll adjust your portfolio automatically for you.”\nThat said, “you can’t just expect your investments will only go up. Even if you had the world’s best human financial adviser you can’t expect that.”\nOthers disagree, and say robo advisers appeal to older investors. “Planning for and paying yourself in retirement is complex. There are many options out there to help investors through it, and robo investing is one of them,” Loh said.\n“Many thoughtful, long-term investors have discovered that they want a more modern, streamlined, and inexpensive way to invest, and robo investing fits the bill. They are happy to let technology handle the mundane activities that are harder and more time-consuming for investors to do themselves,” she added.\nThere is often no door to knock on\nYour robo adviser only knows what you tell it. The simplistic questionnaire you’re required to fill out will on most robo-investing platforms will collect information on your annual income, desired age to retire and the level of risk you’re willing to take on.\nIt won’t however know if you just had a child and would like to begin saving for their education down the road or if you recently lost your job.\n“The question then becomes to whom does that person go to for advice and does that platform offer that and if so, to what level of complexity?” said Barse.\nNot all platforms give individualized investment advice and the hybrid models that do offer advice from a human tend to charge higher annual fees.\nAdditionally, a robo adviser won’t necessarily “manage your money with tax efficiency at front of mind,” said Roger Ma, a certified financial planner at Lifelaidout, a New York City-based financial advisory group.\nFor instance, one common way investors offset the taxes they pay on long-term investments is by selling assets that have accrued losses. Traditional advisers often specialize in constructing portfolios that lead to the most tax-efficient outcomes, said Ma, who is the author of “Work Your Money, Not Your Life”.\nBut with robo investing, the trades that are made for you are the same ones that are being made for a slew of other investors who may fall under a different tax-bracket than you.\nOn top of that, while robo investing may feel like a simplistic way to get into investing, especially for beginners it can “overcomplicate investing,” Ma said.\n“If you are just looking to dip your toe in and you want to feel like you’re invested in a diversified portfolio, I wouldn’t say definitely don’t do a robo adviser,” he said.\nDon’t rule out investing through a target-date fund that selects a single fund to invest in and adjusts the position over time based on their investment goals, he added.\nBut not everyone can tell the difference between robo advice and advice from a human being. In 2015, MarketWatch asked four prominent robo advisers and four of the traditional, flesh-and-blood variety to construct portfolios for a hypothetical 35-year-old investor with $40,000 to invest.\nThe results were, perhaps, surprising for critics of robo advisers. The robots’ suggestions were “not massively different” from what the human advisers proposed, said Michael Kitces, Pinnacle Advisory Group’s research director, after reviewing the results.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1305,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":360173020,"gmtCreate":1613877279060,"gmtModify":1634551994989,"author":{"id":"3575103913694167","authorId":"3575103913694167","name":"sukehhh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4dddb8308a2c3c9746367f01767eee5e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575103913694167","idStr":"3575103913694167"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/360173020","repostId":"1143100356","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1449,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":360398919,"gmtCreate":1613825893731,"gmtModify":1634552096997,"author":{"id":"3575103913694167","authorId":"3575103913694167","name":"sukehhh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4dddb8308a2c3c9746367f01767eee5e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575103913694167","idStr":"3575103913694167"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/360398919","repostId":"1143100356","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1715,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":360799621,"gmtCreate":1613973941963,"gmtModify":1634551698642,"author":{"id":"3575103913694167","authorId":"3575103913694167","name":"sukehhh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4dddb8308a2c3c9746367f01767eee5e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575103913694167","idStr":"3575103913694167"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/360799621","repostId":"1163958969","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1447,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":360790227,"gmtCreate":1613973857169,"gmtModify":1634551699343,"author":{"id":"3575103913694167","authorId":"3575103913694167","name":"sukehhh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4dddb8308a2c3c9746367f01767eee5e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575103913694167","idStr":"3575103913694167"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice!!!","listText":"Nice!!!","text":"Nice!!!","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9aa473aec50c41a28e5963c7bcecea88","width":"750","height":"1654"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/360790227","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1530,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":360171077,"gmtCreate":1613877317199,"gmtModify":1634551994255,"author":{"id":"3575103913694167","authorId":"3575103913694167","name":"sukehhh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4dddb8308a2c3c9746367f01767eee5e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575103913694167","idStr":"3575103913694167"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice read","listText":"Nice read","text":"Nice read","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/360171077","repostId":"1161529893","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1161529893","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1613733842,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1161529893?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-19 19:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Goldman Sachs is joining the robo-investing party — should you?<blockquote>高盛正在加入机器人投资行列——你应该加入吗？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1161529893","media":"Marketwatch","summary":"‘Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.Robo investing has become increasingly ubiquitous on practically every brokerage platform. Until Tuesday, Goldman Sachs GS, -0.91% restricted its robo-advisory service, Marcus, to people who had at least $10 million to invest.Now anyone with at least $1,000 to invest in can access the same trading algorithms that have been used by so","content":"<p>  ‘Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.  Robo investing has become increasingly ubiquitous on practically every brokerage platform. Until Tuesday, Goldman Sachs GS, -0.91% restricted its robo-advisory service, Marcus, to people who had at least $10 million to invest.</p><p><blockquote>加州圣地亚哥的财务顾问万斯·巴斯说，就像在拉斯维加斯一样，众议院通常会获胜。他经营着一家名为Your Dedicated Fiduciary的公司。机器人投资在几乎每个经纪平台上都变得越来越普遍。直到周二，高盛GS(-0.91%)将其机器人咨询服务Marcus限制为至少有1000万美元可投资的人。</blockquote></p><p> Now anyone with at least $1,000 to invest in can access the same trading algorithms that have been used by some of Goldman Sachs’ wealthiest clients for a 0.35% annual advisory fee. But investing experts say there are more costs to consider before jumping on the robo-investing train.</p><p><blockquote>现在，任何拥有至少1,000美元可投资的人都可以使用高盛一些最富有的客户使用的相同交易算法，每年只需支付0.35%的咨询费。但投资专家表示，在跳上机器人投资列车之前，需要考虑更多成本。</blockquote></p><p> “Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.</p><p><blockquote>“就像在拉斯维加斯一样，众议院通常会获胜，”加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥的财务顾问万斯·巴斯(Vance Barse)说，他经营着一家名为Your Dedicated Fiduciary的公司。</blockquote></p><p> Although the 35 basis-point price tag is a “loss leader” to Goldman Sachs, he said companies typically make such offers in order to attract clients to cross-sell them banking products.</p><p><blockquote>尽管35个基点的价格标签对高盛来说是一个“亏损领头羊”，但他表示，公司通常会提出这样的报价，以吸引客户向他们交叉销售银行产品。</blockquote></p><p> “People forget that banks are ultimately in the business of making money,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>“人们忘记了银行最终是为了赚钱，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Goldman Sachs declined to comment.</p><p><blockquote>高盛拒绝置评。</blockquote></p><p> The company is among other major financial-services firms offering digital advisers, including Vanguard, Fidelity and Schwab SCHW, +1.03% and startups such as Betterment and Wealthfront.</p><p><blockquote>该公司是其他提供数字顾问的主要金融服务公司之一，包括Vanguard、Fidelity和Schwab SCHW，+1.03%，以及Betterment和Wealthfront等初创公司。</blockquote></p><p> Fees for robo advisers can start at around 0.25%, and increase to 1% and above for traditional brokers. A survey of nearly 1,000 financial planners by Inside Information, a trade publication, found that the bigger the portfolio, the lower the percentage clients paid in fees.</p><p><blockquote>机器人顾问的费用从0.25%左右开始，传统经纪商的费用会增加到1%及以上。行业出版物Inside Information对近1,000名理财规划师进行的一项调查发现，投资组合越大，客户支付的费用比例就越低。</blockquote></p><p> The median annual charge hovered at around 1% for portfolios of $1 million or less, and 0.5% for portfolios worth $5 million to $10 million.</p><p><blockquote>对于100万美元或以下的投资组合，年费中位数徘徊在1%左右，对于价值500万至1000万美元的投资组合，年费中位数徘徊在0.5%左右。</blockquote></p><p> Robo advisers like those on offer from Goldman Sachs and Betterment differ from robo platforms like Robinhood. The former suggest portfolios focused on exchange-traded funds, while Robinhood allows users to invest in individual ETFs, stocks, options and even cryptocurrencies.</p><p><blockquote>高盛和Betterment提供的机器人顾问与Robinhood等机器人平台不同。前者建议投资组合专注于交易所交易基金，而Robinhood允许用户投资个人ETF、股票、期权甚至加密货币。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Robo investing as a self-driving car</b></p><p><blockquote><b>机器人投资作为自动驾驶汽车</b></blockquote></p><p> Consumers have turned to robo-investing at unprecedented levels during the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>在疫情期间，消费者以前所未有的水平转向机器人投资。</blockquote></p><p> The rate of new accounts opened jumped between 50% and 300% during the first quarter of 2020 compared to the fourth quarter of last year, according to a May report published by research and advisory firm Aite Group.</p><p><blockquote>根据研究和咨询公司艾特集团5月份发布的一份报告，与去年第四季度相比，2020年第一季度的新开户率跃升了50%至300%。</blockquote></p><p> So what is rob-investing? Think of it like a self-driving car.</p><p><blockquote>那么什么是rob投资呢？把它想象成一辆自动驾驶汽车。</blockquote></p><p> You put in your destination, buckle up in the backseat and your driver (robo adviser) will get there. You, the passenger, can’t easily slam the breaks if you fear your driver is leading you in the wrong direction. Nor can you put your foot on the gas pedal if you’re in a rush and want to get to your destination faster.</p><p><blockquote>你输入你的目的地，在后座系好安全带，你的司机（机器人顾问）就会到达那里。作为乘客，如果你担心你的司机把你引向错误的方向，你就不能轻易刹车。如果您赶时间并想更快地到达目的地，也不能踩油门。</blockquote></p><p> Robo-investing platforms use advanced-trading algorithm software to design investment portfolios based on factors such as an individual’s appetite for risk-taking and desired short-term and long-term returns.</p><p><blockquote>机器人投资平台使用先进的交易算法软件，根据个人的风险偏好以及期望的短期和长期回报等因素来设计投资组合。</blockquote></p><p> There are over 200 platforms that provide these services charging typically no more than a 0.5% annual advisory fee, compared to the 1% annual fee human investment advisors charge.</p><p><blockquote>有200多个平台提供这些服务，每年收取的咨询费通常不超过0.5%，而人力投资顾问收取的年费为1%。</blockquote></p><p> And rather than investing entirely on your own, which can become a second job and lead to emotional investment decisions, robo advisers handle buying and selling assets.</p><p><blockquote>机器人顾问处理资产的买卖，而不是完全自己投资，这可能成为第二份工作并导致情绪化的投资决策。</blockquote></p><p> Cynthia Loh, Schwab vice president of Digital Advice and Innovation, disagrees, and argues that robo investing doesn’t mean giving technology control of your money. Schwab, she said, has a team of investment experts who oversee investment strategy and keep watch during periods of market volatility, although some services have more input from humans than others.</p><p><blockquote>嘉信理财数字咨询和创新副总裁辛西娅·洛(Cynthia Loh)不同意这种观点，她认为机器人投资并不意味着让技术控制你的资金。她说，嘉信理财拥有一支投资专家团队，负责监督投资策略并在市场波动期间进行监控，尽管有些服务比其他服务有更多的人工输入。</blockquote></p><p> As she recently wrote on MarketWatch: “One common misconception about automated investing is that choosing a robo adviser essentially means handing control of your money over to robots. The truth is that robo solutions have a combination of automated and human components running things behind the scenes.”</p><p><blockquote>正如她最近在MarketWatch上所写：“关于自动化投资的一个常见误解是，选择机器人顾问本质上意味着将资金的控制权交给机器人。事实是，机器人解决方案结合了自动化和人工组件，在幕后运行事物。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>Robos appeal to inexperienced investors</b></p><p><blockquote><b>机器人吸引缺乏经验的投资者</b></blockquote></p><p> Robo investing tends to appeal to inexperienced investors or ones who don’t have the time or energy to manage their own portfolios. These investors can take comfort in the “set it and forget it approach to investing and overtime let the markets do their thing,” Barse said.</p><p><blockquote>机器人投资往往吸引缺乏经验的投资者或没有时间或精力管理自己投资组合的投资者。巴尔斯说，这些投资者可以对“一劳永逸”的投资方法感到放心，随着时间的推移，让市场做自己的事情”。</blockquote></p><p> That makes it much easier to stomach market volatility knowing that you don’t necessarily have to make spur-of-the-moment decisions to buy or sell assets, said Tiffany Lam-Balfour, an investing and retirement specialist at NerdWallet.</p><p><blockquote>NerdWallet的投资和退休专家蒂芙尼·拉姆-贝尔福(Tiffany Lam-Balfour)表示，这使得你更容易承受市场波动，因为你不一定必须做出购买或出售资产的冲动决定。</blockquote></p><p> “When you’re investing, you don’t want to keep looking at the market and going ‘Oh I need to get out of this,’” she said. “You want to leave it to the professionals to get you through it because they know what your time horizon is, and they’ll adjust your portfolio automatically for you.”</p><p><blockquote>“当你投资时，你不会想一直关注市场并说‘哦，我需要摆脱困境’，”她说。“你想让专业人士来帮你度过难关，因为他们知道你的时间范围，他们会自动为你调整你的投资组合。”</blockquote></p><p></p><p> That said, “you can’t just expect your investments will only go up. Even if you had the world’s best human financial adviser you can’t expect that.”</p><p><blockquote>也就是说，“你不能指望你的投资只会上涨。即使你有世界上最好的人类财务顾问，你也不能指望这一点。”</blockquote></p><p> Others disagree, and say robo advisers appeal to older investors. “Planning for and paying yourself in retirement is complex. There are many options out there to help investors through it, and robo investing is one of them,” Loh said.</p><p><blockquote>其他人不同意，并表示机器人顾问对老年投资者有吸引力。“退休后的规划和支付费用很复杂。有很多选择可以帮助投资者度过难关，机器人投资就是其中之一，”Loh说。</blockquote></p><p> “Many thoughtful, long-term investors have discovered that they want a more modern, streamlined, and inexpensive way to invest, and robo investing fits the bill. They are happy to let technology handle the mundane activities that are harder and more time-consuming for investors to do themselves,” she added.</p><p><blockquote>“许多深思熟虑的长期投资者发现，他们想要一种更现代、更简化、更便宜的投资方式，而机器人投资正好符合这一要求。他们很乐意让技术来处理更困难、更耗时的日常活动。投资者自己做，”她补充道。</blockquote></p><p> <b>There is often no door to knock on</b></p><p><blockquote><b>常常无门可敲</b></blockquote></p><p> Your robo adviser only knows what you tell it. The simplistic questionnaire you’re required to fill out will on most robo-investing platforms will collect information on your annual income, desired age to retire and the level of risk you’re willing to take on.</p><p><blockquote>你的机器人顾问只知道你告诉它什么。大多数机器人投资平台上要求您填写的简单问卷将收集有关您的年收入、期望退休年龄以及您愿意承担的风险水平的信息。</blockquote></p><p> It won’t however know if you just had a child and would like to begin saving for their education down the road or if you recently lost your job.</p><p><blockquote>然而，它不会知道你是否刚刚有了一个孩子，并想开始为他们的教育存钱，或者你是否最近失业了。</blockquote></p><p> “The question then becomes to whom does that person go to for advice and does that platform offer that and if so, to what level of complexity?” said Barse.</p><p><blockquote>“那么问题就变成了那个人向谁寻求建议？该平台是否提供建议？如果提供，复杂程度如何？”巴斯说。</blockquote></p><p> Not all platforms give individualized investment advice and the hybrid models that do offer advice from a human tend to charge higher annual fees.</p><p><blockquote>并非所有平台都提供个性化投资建议，提供人工建议的混合模式往往会收取更高的年费。</blockquote></p><p> Additionally, a robo adviser won’t necessarily “manage your money with tax efficiency at front of mind,” said Roger Ma, a certified financial planner at Lifelaidout, a New York City-based financial advisory group.</p><p><blockquote>此外，纽约市财务咨询集团Lifelaidout的注册财务规划师罗杰·马(Roger Ma)表示，机器人顾问不一定“在管理资金时首先考虑税收效率”。</blockquote></p><p> For instance, one common way investors offset the taxes they pay on long-term investments is by selling assets that have accrued losses. Traditional advisers often specialize in constructing portfolios that lead to the most tax-efficient outcomes, said Ma, who is the author of “Work Your Money, Not Your Life”.</p><p><blockquote>例如，投资者抵消长期投资税款的一种常见方式是出售已累计亏损的资产。《工作你的钱，而不是你的生活》一书的作者马说，传统顾问通常专注于构建能带来最节税结果的投资组合。</blockquote></p><p> But with robo investing, the trades that are made for you are the same ones that are being made for a slew of other investors who may fall under a different tax-bracket than you.</p><p><blockquote>但通过机器人投资，为您进行的交易与为许多其他投资者进行的交易是相同的，这些投资者可能属于与您不同的税级。</blockquote></p><p> On top of that, while robo investing may feel like a simplistic way to get into investing, especially for beginners it can “overcomplicate investing,” Ma said.</p><p><blockquote>最重要的是，虽然机器人投资可能感觉像是一种简单的投资方式，特别是对于初学者来说，它可能会“使投资过于复杂”，马云说。</blockquote></p><p> “If you are just looking to dip your toe in and you want to feel like you’re invested in a diversified portfolio, I wouldn’t say definitely don’t do a robo adviser,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>“如果你只是想尝试一下，并且想感觉自己投资于多元化的投资组合，我不会说绝对不要聘请机器人顾问，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Don’t rule out investing through a target-date fund that selects a single fund to invest in and adjusts the position over time based on their investment goals, he added.</p><p><blockquote>他补充说，不要排除通过目标日期基金进行投资，该基金选择单一基金进行投资，并根据投资目标随着时间的推移调整头寸。</blockquote></p><p> But not everyone can tell the difference between robo advice and advice from a human being. In 2015, MarketWatch asked four prominent robo advisers and four of the traditional, flesh-and-blood variety to construct portfolios for a hypothetical 35-year-old investor with $40,000 to invest.</p><p><blockquote>但并不是每个人都能区分机器人的建议和人类的建议。2015年，MarketWatch请四位著名的机器人顾问和四位传统的有血有肉的机器人顾问为一位假设的35岁投资者构建投资组合，投资金额为40,000美元。</blockquote></p><p> The results were, perhaps, surprising for critics of robo advisers. The robots’ suggestions were “not massively different” from what the human advisers proposed, said Michael Kitces, Pinnacle Advisory Group’s research director, after reviewing the results.</p><p><blockquote>对于机器人顾问的批评者来说，结果或许令人惊讶。Pinnacle Advisory Group的研究总监Michael Kitces在审查结果后表示，机器人的建议与人类顾问的建议“没有太大不同”。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Sachs is joining the robo-investing party — should you?<blockquote>高盛正在加入机器人投资行列——你应该加入吗？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Sachs is joining the robo-investing party — should you?<blockquote>高盛正在加入机器人投资行列——你应该加入吗？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Marketwatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-02-19 19:24</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>  ‘Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.  Robo investing has become increasingly ubiquitous on practically every brokerage platform. Until Tuesday, Goldman Sachs GS, -0.91% restricted its robo-advisory service, Marcus, to people who had at least $10 million to invest.</p><p><blockquote>加州圣地亚哥的财务顾问万斯·巴斯说，就像在拉斯维加斯一样，众议院通常会获胜。他经营着一家名为Your Dedicated Fiduciary的公司。机器人投资在几乎每个经纪平台上都变得越来越普遍。直到周二，高盛GS(-0.91%)将其机器人咨询服务Marcus限制为至少有1000万美元可投资的人。</blockquote></p><p> Now anyone with at least $1,000 to invest in can access the same trading algorithms that have been used by some of Goldman Sachs’ wealthiest clients for a 0.35% annual advisory fee. But investing experts say there are more costs to consider before jumping on the robo-investing train.</p><p><blockquote>现在，任何拥有至少1,000美元可投资的人都可以使用高盛一些最富有的客户使用的相同交易算法，每年只需支付0.35%的咨询费。但投资专家表示，在跳上机器人投资列车之前，需要考虑更多成本。</blockquote></p><p> “Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.</p><p><blockquote>“就像在拉斯维加斯一样，众议院通常会获胜，”加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥的财务顾问万斯·巴斯(Vance Barse)说，他经营着一家名为Your Dedicated Fiduciary的公司。</blockquote></p><p> Although the 35 basis-point price tag is a “loss leader” to Goldman Sachs, he said companies typically make such offers in order to attract clients to cross-sell them banking products.</p><p><blockquote>尽管35个基点的价格标签对高盛来说是一个“亏损领头羊”，但他表示，公司通常会提出这样的报价，以吸引客户向他们交叉销售银行产品。</blockquote></p><p> “People forget that banks are ultimately in the business of making money,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>“人们忘记了银行最终是为了赚钱，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Goldman Sachs declined to comment.</p><p><blockquote>高盛拒绝置评。</blockquote></p><p> The company is among other major financial-services firms offering digital advisers, including Vanguard, Fidelity and Schwab SCHW, +1.03% and startups such as Betterment and Wealthfront.</p><p><blockquote>该公司是其他提供数字顾问的主要金融服务公司之一，包括Vanguard、Fidelity和Schwab SCHW，+1.03%，以及Betterment和Wealthfront等初创公司。</blockquote></p><p> Fees for robo advisers can start at around 0.25%, and increase to 1% and above for traditional brokers. A survey of nearly 1,000 financial planners by Inside Information, a trade publication, found that the bigger the portfolio, the lower the percentage clients paid in fees.</p><p><blockquote>机器人顾问的费用从0.25%左右开始，传统经纪商的费用会增加到1%及以上。行业出版物Inside Information对近1,000名理财规划师进行的一项调查发现，投资组合越大，客户支付的费用比例就越低。</blockquote></p><p> The median annual charge hovered at around 1% for portfolios of $1 million or less, and 0.5% for portfolios worth $5 million to $10 million.</p><p><blockquote>对于100万美元或以下的投资组合，年费中位数徘徊在1%左右，对于价值500万至1000万美元的投资组合，年费中位数徘徊在0.5%左右。</blockquote></p><p> Robo advisers like those on offer from Goldman Sachs and Betterment differ from robo platforms like Robinhood. The former suggest portfolios focused on exchange-traded funds, while Robinhood allows users to invest in individual ETFs, stocks, options and even cryptocurrencies.</p><p><blockquote>高盛和Betterment提供的机器人顾问与Robinhood等机器人平台不同。前者建议投资组合专注于交易所交易基金，而Robinhood允许用户投资个人ETF、股票、期权甚至加密货币。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Robo investing as a self-driving car</b></p><p><blockquote><b>机器人投资作为自动驾驶汽车</b></blockquote></p><p> Consumers have turned to robo-investing at unprecedented levels during the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>在疫情期间，消费者以前所未有的水平转向机器人投资。</blockquote></p><p> The rate of new accounts opened jumped between 50% and 300% during the first quarter of 2020 compared to the fourth quarter of last year, according to a May report published by research and advisory firm Aite Group.</p><p><blockquote>根据研究和咨询公司艾特集团5月份发布的一份报告，与去年第四季度相比，2020年第一季度的新开户率跃升了50%至300%。</blockquote></p><p> So what is rob-investing? Think of it like a self-driving car.</p><p><blockquote>那么什么是rob投资呢？把它想象成一辆自动驾驶汽车。</blockquote></p><p> You put in your destination, buckle up in the backseat and your driver (robo adviser) will get there. You, the passenger, can’t easily slam the breaks if you fear your driver is leading you in the wrong direction. Nor can you put your foot on the gas pedal if you’re in a rush and want to get to your destination faster.</p><p><blockquote>你输入你的目的地，在后座系好安全带，你的司机（机器人顾问）就会到达那里。作为乘客，如果你担心你的司机把你引向错误的方向，你就不能轻易刹车。如果您赶时间并想更快地到达目的地，也不能踩油门。</blockquote></p><p> Robo-investing platforms use advanced-trading algorithm software to design investment portfolios based on factors such as an individual’s appetite for risk-taking and desired short-term and long-term returns.</p><p><blockquote>机器人投资平台使用先进的交易算法软件，根据个人的风险偏好以及期望的短期和长期回报等因素来设计投资组合。</blockquote></p><p> There are over 200 platforms that provide these services charging typically no more than a 0.5% annual advisory fee, compared to the 1% annual fee human investment advisors charge.</p><p><blockquote>有200多个平台提供这些服务，每年收取的咨询费通常不超过0.5%，而人力投资顾问收取的年费为1%。</blockquote></p><p> And rather than investing entirely on your own, which can become a second job and lead to emotional investment decisions, robo advisers handle buying and selling assets.</p><p><blockquote>机器人顾问处理资产的买卖，而不是完全自己投资，这可能成为第二份工作并导致情绪化的投资决策。</blockquote></p><p> Cynthia Loh, Schwab vice president of Digital Advice and Innovation, disagrees, and argues that robo investing doesn’t mean giving technology control of your money. Schwab, she said, has a team of investment experts who oversee investment strategy and keep watch during periods of market volatility, although some services have more input from humans than others.</p><p><blockquote>嘉信理财数字咨询和创新副总裁辛西娅·洛(Cynthia Loh)不同意这种观点，她认为机器人投资并不意味着让技术控制你的资金。她说，嘉信理财拥有一支投资专家团队，负责监督投资策略并在市场波动期间进行监控，尽管有些服务比其他服务有更多的人工输入。</blockquote></p><p> As she recently wrote on MarketWatch: “One common misconception about automated investing is that choosing a robo adviser essentially means handing control of your money over to robots. The truth is that robo solutions have a combination of automated and human components running things behind the scenes.”</p><p><blockquote>正如她最近在MarketWatch上所写：“关于自动化投资的一个常见误解是，选择机器人顾问本质上意味着将资金的控制权交给机器人。事实是，机器人解决方案结合了自动化和人工组件，在幕后运行事物。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>Robos appeal to inexperienced investors</b></p><p><blockquote><b>机器人吸引缺乏经验的投资者</b></blockquote></p><p> Robo investing tends to appeal to inexperienced investors or ones who don’t have the time or energy to manage their own portfolios. These investors can take comfort in the “set it and forget it approach to investing and overtime let the markets do their thing,” Barse said.</p><p><blockquote>机器人投资往往吸引缺乏经验的投资者或没有时间或精力管理自己投资组合的投资者。巴尔斯说，这些投资者可以对“一劳永逸”的投资方法感到放心，随着时间的推移，让市场做自己的事情”。</blockquote></p><p> That makes it much easier to stomach market volatility knowing that you don’t necessarily have to make spur-of-the-moment decisions to buy or sell assets, said Tiffany Lam-Balfour, an investing and retirement specialist at NerdWallet.</p><p><blockquote>NerdWallet的投资和退休专家蒂芙尼·拉姆-贝尔福(Tiffany Lam-Balfour)表示，这使得你更容易承受市场波动，因为你不一定必须做出购买或出售资产的冲动决定。</blockquote></p><p> “When you’re investing, you don’t want to keep looking at the market and going ‘Oh I need to get out of this,’” she said. “You want to leave it to the professionals to get you through it because they know what your time horizon is, and they’ll adjust your portfolio automatically for you.”</p><p><blockquote>“当你投资时，你不会想一直关注市场并说‘哦，我需要摆脱困境’，”她说。“你想让专业人士来帮你度过难关，因为他们知道你的时间范围，他们会自动为你调整你的投资组合。”</blockquote></p><p></p><p> That said, “you can’t just expect your investments will only go up. Even if you had the world’s best human financial adviser you can’t expect that.”</p><p><blockquote>也就是说，“你不能指望你的投资只会上涨。即使你有世界上最好的人类财务顾问，你也不能指望这一点。”</blockquote></p><p> Others disagree, and say robo advisers appeal to older investors. “Planning for and paying yourself in retirement is complex. There are many options out there to help investors through it, and robo investing is one of them,” Loh said.</p><p><blockquote>其他人不同意，并表示机器人顾问对老年投资者有吸引力。“退休后的规划和支付费用很复杂。有很多选择可以帮助投资者度过难关，机器人投资就是其中之一，”Loh说。</blockquote></p><p> “Many thoughtful, long-term investors have discovered that they want a more modern, streamlined, and inexpensive way to invest, and robo investing fits the bill. They are happy to let technology handle the mundane activities that are harder and more time-consuming for investors to do themselves,” she added.</p><p><blockquote>“许多深思熟虑的长期投资者发现，他们想要一种更现代、更简化、更便宜的投资方式，而机器人投资正好符合这一要求。他们很乐意让技术来处理更困难、更耗时的日常活动。投资者自己做，”她补充道。</blockquote></p><p> <b>There is often no door to knock on</b></p><p><blockquote><b>常常无门可敲</b></blockquote></p><p> Your robo adviser only knows what you tell it. The simplistic questionnaire you’re required to fill out will on most robo-investing platforms will collect information on your annual income, desired age to retire and the level of risk you’re willing to take on.</p><p><blockquote>你的机器人顾问只知道你告诉它什么。大多数机器人投资平台上要求您填写的简单问卷将收集有关您的年收入、期望退休年龄以及您愿意承担的风险水平的信息。</blockquote></p><p> It won’t however know if you just had a child and would like to begin saving for their education down the road or if you recently lost your job.</p><p><blockquote>然而，它不会知道你是否刚刚有了一个孩子，并想开始为他们的教育存钱，或者你是否最近失业了。</blockquote></p><p> “The question then becomes to whom does that person go to for advice and does that platform offer that and if so, to what level of complexity?” said Barse.</p><p><blockquote>“那么问题就变成了那个人向谁寻求建议？该平台是否提供建议？如果提供，复杂程度如何？”巴斯说。</blockquote></p><p> Not all platforms give individualized investment advice and the hybrid models that do offer advice from a human tend to charge higher annual fees.</p><p><blockquote>并非所有平台都提供个性化投资建议，提供人工建议的混合模式往往会收取更高的年费。</blockquote></p><p> Additionally, a robo adviser won’t necessarily “manage your money with tax efficiency at front of mind,” said Roger Ma, a certified financial planner at Lifelaidout, a New York City-based financial advisory group.</p><p><blockquote>此外，纽约市财务咨询集团Lifelaidout的注册财务规划师罗杰·马(Roger Ma)表示，机器人顾问不一定“在管理资金时首先考虑税收效率”。</blockquote></p><p> For instance, one common way investors offset the taxes they pay on long-term investments is by selling assets that have accrued losses. Traditional advisers often specialize in constructing portfolios that lead to the most tax-efficient outcomes, said Ma, who is the author of “Work Your Money, Not Your Life”.</p><p><blockquote>例如，投资者抵消长期投资税款的一种常见方式是出售已累计亏损的资产。《工作你的钱，而不是你的生活》一书的作者马说，传统顾问通常专注于构建能带来最节税结果的投资组合。</blockquote></p><p> But with robo investing, the trades that are made for you are the same ones that are being made for a slew of other investors who may fall under a different tax-bracket than you.</p><p><blockquote>但通过机器人投资，为您进行的交易与为许多其他投资者进行的交易是相同的，这些投资者可能属于与您不同的税级。</blockquote></p><p> On top of that, while robo investing may feel like a simplistic way to get into investing, especially for beginners it can “overcomplicate investing,” Ma said.</p><p><blockquote>最重要的是，虽然机器人投资可能感觉像是一种简单的投资方式，特别是对于初学者来说，它可能会“使投资过于复杂”，马云说。</blockquote></p><p> “If you are just looking to dip your toe in and you want to feel like you’re invested in a diversified portfolio, I wouldn’t say definitely don’t do a robo adviser,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>“如果你只是想尝试一下，并且想感觉自己投资于多元化的投资组合，我不会说绝对不要聘请机器人顾问，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Don’t rule out investing through a target-date fund that selects a single fund to invest in and adjusts the position over time based on their investment goals, he added.</p><p><blockquote>他补充说，不要排除通过目标日期基金进行投资，该基金选择单一基金进行投资，并根据投资目标随着时间的推移调整头寸。</blockquote></p><p> But not everyone can tell the difference between robo advice and advice from a human being. In 2015, MarketWatch asked four prominent robo advisers and four of the traditional, flesh-and-blood variety to construct portfolios for a hypothetical 35-year-old investor with $40,000 to invest.</p><p><blockquote>但并不是每个人都能区分机器人的建议和人类的建议。2015年，MarketWatch请四位著名的机器人顾问和四位传统的有血有肉的机器人顾问为一位假设的35岁投资者构建投资组合，投资金额为40,000美元。</blockquote></p><p> The results were, perhaps, surprising for critics of robo advisers. The robots’ suggestions were “not massively different” from what the human advisers proposed, said Michael Kitces, Pinnacle Advisory Group’s research director, after reviewing the results.</p><p><blockquote>对于机器人顾问的批评者来说，结果或许令人惊讶。Pinnacle Advisory Group的研究总监Michael Kitces在审查结果后表示，机器人的建议与人类顾问的建议“没有太大不同”。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/goldman-sachs-is-joining-the-robo-investing-party-should-you-11613658128?mod=home-page\">Marketwatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/goldman-sachs-is-joining-the-robo-investing-party-should-you-11613658128?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1161529893","content_text":"‘Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.\n\nRobo investing has become increasingly ubiquitous on practically every brokerage platform. Until Tuesday, Goldman Sachs GS, -0.91% restricted its robo-advisory service, Marcus, to people who had at least $10 million to invest.\nNow anyone with at least $1,000 to invest in can access the same trading algorithms that have been used by some of Goldman Sachs’ wealthiest clients for a 0.35% annual advisory fee. But investing experts say there are more costs to consider before jumping on the robo-investing train.\n“Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.\nAlthough the 35 basis-point price tag is a “loss leader” to Goldman Sachs, he said companies typically make such offers in order to attract clients to cross-sell them banking products.\n“People forget that banks are ultimately in the business of making money,” he said.\nGoldman Sachs declined to comment.\nThe company is among other major financial-services firms offering digital advisers, including Vanguard, Fidelity and Schwab SCHW, +1.03% and startups such as Betterment and Wealthfront.\nFees for robo advisers can start at around 0.25%, and increase to 1% and above for traditional brokers. A survey of nearly 1,000 financial planners by Inside Information, a trade publication, found that the bigger the portfolio, the lower the percentage clients paid in fees.\nThe median annual charge hovered at around 1% for portfolios of $1 million or less, and 0.5% for portfolios worth $5 million to $10 million.\nRobo advisers like those on offer from Goldman Sachs and Betterment differ from robo platforms like Robinhood. The former suggest portfolios focused on exchange-traded funds, while Robinhood allows users to invest in individual ETFs, stocks, options and even cryptocurrencies.\nRobo investing as a self-driving car\nConsumers have turned to robo-investing at unprecedented levels during the pandemic.\nThe rate of new accounts opened jumped between 50% and 300% during the first quarter of 2020 compared to the fourth quarter of last year, according to a May report published by research and advisory firm Aite Group.\nSo what is rob-investing? Think of it like a self-driving car.\nYou put in your destination, buckle up in the backseat and your driver (robo adviser) will get there. You, the passenger, can’t easily slam the breaks if you fear your driver is leading you in the wrong direction. Nor can you put your foot on the gas pedal if you’re in a rush and want to get to your destination faster.\nRobo-investing platforms use advanced-trading algorithm software to design investment portfolios based on factors such as an individual’s appetite for risk-taking and desired short-term and long-term returns.\nThere are over 200 platforms that provide these services charging typically no more than a 0.5% annual advisory fee, compared to the 1% annual fee human investment advisors charge.\nAnd rather than investing entirely on your own, which can become a second job and lead to emotional investment decisions, robo advisers handle buying and selling assets.\nCynthia Loh, Schwab vice president of Digital Advice and Innovation, disagrees, and argues that robo investing doesn’t mean giving technology control of your money. Schwab, she said, has a team of investment experts who oversee investment strategy and keep watch during periods of market volatility, although some services have more input from humans than others.\nAs she recently wrote on MarketWatch: “One common misconception about automated investing is that choosing a robo adviser essentially means handing control of your money over to robots. The truth is that robo solutions have a combination of automated and human components running things behind the scenes.”\nRobos appeal to inexperienced investors\nRobo investing tends to appeal to inexperienced investors or ones who don’t have the time or energy to manage their own portfolios. These investors can take comfort in the “set it and forget it approach to investing and overtime let the markets do their thing,” Barse said.\nThat makes it much easier to stomach market volatility knowing that you don’t necessarily have to make spur-of-the-moment decisions to buy or sell assets, said Tiffany Lam-Balfour, an investing and retirement specialist at NerdWallet.\n“When you’re investing, you don’t want to keep looking at the market and going ‘Oh I need to get out of this,’” she said. “You want to leave it to the professionals to get you through it because they know what your time horizon is, and they’ll adjust your portfolio automatically for you.”\nThat said, “you can’t just expect your investments will only go up. Even if you had the world’s best human financial adviser you can’t expect that.”\nOthers disagree, and say robo advisers appeal to older investors. “Planning for and paying yourself in retirement is complex. There are many options out there to help investors through it, and robo investing is one of them,” Loh said.\n“Many thoughtful, long-term investors have discovered that they want a more modern, streamlined, and inexpensive way to invest, and robo investing fits the bill. They are happy to let technology handle the mundane activities that are harder and more time-consuming for investors to do themselves,” she added.\nThere is often no door to knock on\nYour robo adviser only knows what you tell it. The simplistic questionnaire you’re required to fill out will on most robo-investing platforms will collect information on your annual income, desired age to retire and the level of risk you’re willing to take on.\nIt won’t however know if you just had a child and would like to begin saving for their education down the road or if you recently lost your job.\n“The question then becomes to whom does that person go to for advice and does that platform offer that and if so, to what level of complexity?” said Barse.\nNot all platforms give individualized investment advice and the hybrid models that do offer advice from a human tend to charge higher annual fees.\nAdditionally, a robo adviser won’t necessarily “manage your money with tax efficiency at front of mind,” said Roger Ma, a certified financial planner at Lifelaidout, a New York City-based financial advisory group.\nFor instance, one common way investors offset the taxes they pay on long-term investments is by selling assets that have accrued losses. Traditional advisers often specialize in constructing portfolios that lead to the most tax-efficient outcomes, said Ma, who is the author of “Work Your Money, Not Your Life”.\nBut with robo investing, the trades that are made for you are the same ones that are being made for a slew of other investors who may fall under a different tax-bracket than you.\nOn top of that, while robo investing may feel like a simplistic way to get into investing, especially for beginners it can “overcomplicate investing,” Ma said.\n“If you are just looking to dip your toe in and you want to feel like you’re invested in a diversified portfolio, I wouldn’t say definitely don’t do a robo adviser,” he said.\nDon’t rule out investing through a target-date fund that selects a single fund to invest in and adjusts the position over time based on their investment goals, he added.\nBut not everyone can tell the difference between robo advice and advice from a human being. In 2015, MarketWatch asked four prominent robo advisers and four of the traditional, flesh-and-blood variety to construct portfolios for a hypothetical 35-year-old investor with $40,000 to invest.\nThe results were, perhaps, surprising for critics of robo advisers. The robots’ suggestions were “not massively different” from what the human advisers proposed, said Michael Kitces, Pinnacle Advisory Group’s research director, after reviewing the results.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1305,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":360799971,"gmtCreate":1613973908593,"gmtModify":1634551698864,"author":{"id":"3575103913694167","authorId":"3575103913694167","name":"sukehhh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4dddb8308a2c3c9746367f01767eee5e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575103913694167","idStr":"3575103913694167"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/360799971","repostId":"1124857901","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124857901","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1613970854,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124857901?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-22 13:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. stock-market investors are already betting on an infrastructure spending spree<blockquote>美国股市投资者已经押注基础设施支出热潮</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124857901","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Potential tax hikes, inflation worries partly blunt potential upside from infrastructure spending\nIn","content":"<p>Potential tax hikes, inflation worries partly blunt potential upside from infrastructure spending</p><p><blockquote>潜在的增税和通胀担忧部分削弱了基础设施支出的潜在上行空间</blockquote></p><p> Investors are once again factoring in the prospect of a big round of long-term infrastructure spending even as U.S. lawmakers work toward a short-term round of relief that’s expected to come in near President Joe Biden’s $1.9 trillion price tag.</p><p><blockquote>尽管美国立法者正在努力制定一轮短期救助计划，预计将接近总统乔·拜登1.9万亿美元的价格，但投资者再次考虑到了一轮大规模长期基础设施支出的前景。</blockquote></p><p> Analysts have already started to “embed expectations” for infrastructure spending, as evidenced by a 25% surge in projected 2021 earnings for companies in the S&amp;P 500 machinery sub-index since June, as opposed to an average rise or around 6% for companies the broader S&amp;P 500 index, said Mark Hackett, chief of investment research at Nationwide, in an interview.</p><p><blockquote>分析师已经开始“嵌入对基础设施支出的预期”，自6月份以来，标普500机械分类指数中公司的预计2021年盈利飙升了25%，而该指数公司的平均涨幅约为6%。Nationwide投资研究主管Mark Hackett在接受采访时表示，更广泛的标普500指数。</blockquote></p><p> The machinery group, which along with the broader industrials sector is seen as a primary beneficiary of a boost in infrastructure spending, has rallied around 118% from its pandemic lows set last March, versus the S&amp;P 500’s 78% rally. Industrials are up more than 86% from those lows, while materials stocks, which investors also expect to benefit, have bounced 95%.</p><p><blockquote>该机械集团与更广泛的工业部门一起被视为基础设施支出增加的主要受益者，该集团已较去年3月创下的大流行低点上涨约118%，而标普500则上涨了78%。工业股较低点上涨了86%以上，而投资者预计也将受益的材料股已反弹95%。</blockquote></p><p> No doubt, part of those gains are down to other pro-cyclical factors, including vaccine rollouts, falling COVID-19 cases, and two heavy load of near-term fiscal stimulus, Hackett said. At the same time, investors are also aware that infrastructure spending is quite likely to lead to tax increases which could blunt the upside for stocks.</p><p><blockquote>哈克特表示，毫无疑问，这些收益部分归功于其他顺周期因素，包括疫苗的推出、COVID-19病例的下降以及两项大量的近期财政刺激措施。与此同时，投资者也意识到基础设施支出很可能导致增税，这可能会削弱股市的上涨空间。</blockquote></p><p> U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, in a Thursday interview with CNBC, saidtax increases on corporations and high-income individualswould be used to pay for part of Biden’s infrastructure plan. Yellen said there wasn’t yet a cost estimate for an infrastructure plan that’s still being put together.</p><p><blockquote>美国财政部长珍妮特·耶伦周四在接受CNBC采访时表示，对企业和高收入个人的增税将用于支付拜登基础设施计划的部分费用。耶伦表示，尚未对仍在制定的基础设施计划进行成本估算。</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile, companies that already have a “green” or eco-friendly tilt may be poised to benefit most within the sectors and industries likely to reap the benefits of an infrastructure program, said Elizabeth Vermillion, equity analyst at CFRA, in an interview.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，CFRA股票分析师伊丽莎白·弗米利恩(Elizabeth Vermillion)在接受采访时表示，已经倾向于“绿色”或环保的公司可能会在可能从基础设施计划中受益最多。</blockquote></p><p> That includes companies like construction-equipment giant Caterpillar Inc.,which offer a variety of battery electric and alternative-fuel equipment that could be favored as part of a Biden plan. Trucking companies could also benefit as they look to piggyback on the build out of infrastructure for electric vehicles.</p><p><blockquote>这包括建筑设备巨头卡特彼勒公司（Caterpillar Inc.）等公司，该公司提供各种电池电动和替代燃料设备，这些设备可能会成为拜登计划的一部分。卡车运输公司也可能受益，因为他们希望利用电动汽车基础设施的建设。</blockquote></p><p> Companies related to 5G mobile phone infrastructure may also benefit, she said. That includes not only carriers and the companies developing 5G technology, but also industrial companies that will be building towers, putting wires in the ground and building out the grid.</p><p><blockquote>她表示，与5G手机基础设施相关的公司也可能受益。这不仅包括运营商和开发5G技术的公司，还包括将建造铁塔、铺设电线和建设电网的工业公司。</blockquote></p><p> At the same time, investor enthusiasm may be curbed by memories of 2016, when optimism ran rampant for a big infrastructure push after Donald Trump’s election victory. Those efforts came to nothing, with “Infrastructure Week” eventually becoming a political punchline.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，投资者的热情可能会受到2016年记忆的抑制，当时唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)赢得大选后，人们对大规模基础设施建设的乐观情绪甚嚣尘上。这些努力都化为乌有，“基础设施周”最终成为政治笑柄。</blockquote></p><p> Plenty of skepticism remains.</p><p><blockquote>许多怀疑仍然存在。</blockquote></p><p> Part of the political appeal of a large-scale infrastructure package is it’s ability to put people back to work. But if the economy does pick up momentum as vaccine rollouts continue, the resulting fall in unemployment could serve to undercut enthusiasm for infrastructure spending, said Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research, in remarks at a Thursday online seminar hosted by Capital Institutional Services.</p><p><blockquote>大规模基础设施计划的部分政治吸引力在于它能够让人们重返工作岗位。但DataTrek Research联合创始人尼古拉斯·科拉斯(Nicholas Colas)周四在Capital Institutional Services主办的在线研讨会上发表讲话时表示，如果经济确实随着疫苗的继续推出而回升，由此导致的失业率下降可能会削弱基础设施支出的热情。</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile, if a plan is enacted that includes corporate tax hikes that unwind a portion of the Trump cut from 35% to 21%, investors should expect to see the biggest headwinds for utilities and communications stocks, the two biggest beneficiaries of the tax reduction, Hackett said. The third biggest hit would be suffered by industrial companies, blunting some of the upside from the increased spending.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，如果一项包括提高企业税的计划得以实施，将特朗普减税的一部分从35%降至21%，投资者应该会看到公用事业和通信股面临最大的阻力，这是减税的两个最大受益者，哈克特说。工业企业将遭受第三大打击，削弱支出增加带来的部分上行空间。</blockquote></p><p> It isn’t only stock-market investors that are starting to pencil in prospects for more spending on infrastructure, Hackett said. Rising inflation expectations, in part, also reflect that potential as does the related rise in U.S. Treasury debt yields.</p><p><blockquote>哈克特表示，不仅仅是股市投资者开始考虑增加基础设施支出的前景。通胀预期上升在一定程度上也反映了这种潜力，美国国债收益率的相关上升也是如此。</blockquote></p><p> Indeed, while economists at Bank of America said they remained skeptical of inflation prospects around the globe, they see the U.S. as an exception. Big rounds of fiscal spending already in the pipeline and perhaps to come, including up to $2 trillion in infrastructure spending over four years, remain an upside risk to the inflation outlook, wrote Ethan Harris and Aditya Bhave, in a Feb. 5 note.</p><p><blockquote>事实上，尽管美国银行的经济学家表示，他们仍然对全球通胀前景持怀疑态度，但他们认为美国是个例外。伊森·哈里斯(Ethan Harris)和阿迪亚·巴韦(Aditya Bhave)在2月5日的一份报告中写道，已经在酝酿中以及可能即将到来的大规模财政支出，包括四年内高达2万亿美元的基础设施支出，仍然对通胀前景构成上行风险。</blockquote></p><p> The past week saw stocks end mostly lower but not far off all-time highs, with the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;losing 0.7% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;down 1.6%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;eked out a 0.1% weekly gain.</p><p><blockquote>过去一周，股市大多走低，但距离历史高点不远，标普500下跌0.7%，以科技股为主的纳斯达克综合指数下跌1.6%。道琼斯工业平均指数周涨幅为0.1%。</blockquote></p><p> The week ahead will be closely watched for developments on Biden’s $1.9 trillion relief spending plan.</p><p><blockquote>未来一周将密切关注拜登1.9万亿美元救助支出计划的进展。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell will testify in front of lawmakers about monetary policy Tuesday and Wednesday. On the data front, the highlights include a revision of U.S. fourth-quarter gross domestic product data on Thursday, along with weekly figures on unemployment benefit claims and a reading on January durable-goods orders.</p><p><blockquote>美联储主席鲍威尔将于周二和周三在立法者面前就货币政策作证。数据方面，亮点包括周四对美国第四季度国内生产总值数据的修正，以及每周初请失业金数据和1月份耐用品订单数据。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. stock-market investors are already betting on an infrastructure spending spree<blockquote>美国股市投资者已经押注基础设施支出热潮</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. stock-market investors are already betting on an infrastructure spending spree<blockquote>美国股市投资者已经押注基础设施支出热潮</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">MarketWatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-02-22 13:14</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Potential tax hikes, inflation worries partly blunt potential upside from infrastructure spending</p><p><blockquote>潜在的增税和通胀担忧部分削弱了基础设施支出的潜在上行空间</blockquote></p><p> Investors are once again factoring in the prospect of a big round of long-term infrastructure spending even as U.S. lawmakers work toward a short-term round of relief that’s expected to come in near President Joe Biden’s $1.9 trillion price tag.</p><p><blockquote>尽管美国立法者正在努力制定一轮短期救助计划，预计将接近总统乔·拜登1.9万亿美元的价格，但投资者再次考虑到了一轮大规模长期基础设施支出的前景。</blockquote></p><p> Analysts have already started to “embed expectations” for infrastructure spending, as evidenced by a 25% surge in projected 2021 earnings for companies in the S&amp;P 500 machinery sub-index since June, as opposed to an average rise or around 6% for companies the broader S&amp;P 500 index, said Mark Hackett, chief of investment research at Nationwide, in an interview.</p><p><blockquote>分析师已经开始“嵌入对基础设施支出的预期”，自6月份以来，标普500机械分类指数中公司的预计2021年盈利飙升了25%，而该指数公司的平均涨幅约为6%。Nationwide投资研究主管Mark Hackett在接受采访时表示，更广泛的标普500指数。</blockquote></p><p> The machinery group, which along with the broader industrials sector is seen as a primary beneficiary of a boost in infrastructure spending, has rallied around 118% from its pandemic lows set last March, versus the S&amp;P 500’s 78% rally. Industrials are up more than 86% from those lows, while materials stocks, which investors also expect to benefit, have bounced 95%.</p><p><blockquote>该机械集团与更广泛的工业部门一起被视为基础设施支出增加的主要受益者，该集团已较去年3月创下的大流行低点上涨约118%，而标普500则上涨了78%。工业股较低点上涨了86%以上，而投资者预计也将受益的材料股已反弹95%。</blockquote></p><p> No doubt, part of those gains are down to other pro-cyclical factors, including vaccine rollouts, falling COVID-19 cases, and two heavy load of near-term fiscal stimulus, Hackett said. At the same time, investors are also aware that infrastructure spending is quite likely to lead to tax increases which could blunt the upside for stocks.</p><p><blockquote>哈克特表示，毫无疑问，这些收益部分归功于其他顺周期因素，包括疫苗的推出、COVID-19病例的下降以及两项大量的近期财政刺激措施。与此同时，投资者也意识到基础设施支出很可能导致增税，这可能会削弱股市的上涨空间。</blockquote></p><p> U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, in a Thursday interview with CNBC, saidtax increases on corporations and high-income individualswould be used to pay for part of Biden’s infrastructure plan. Yellen said there wasn’t yet a cost estimate for an infrastructure plan that’s still being put together.</p><p><blockquote>美国财政部长珍妮特·耶伦周四在接受CNBC采访时表示，对企业和高收入个人的增税将用于支付拜登基础设施计划的部分费用。耶伦表示，尚未对仍在制定的基础设施计划进行成本估算。</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile, companies that already have a “green” or eco-friendly tilt may be poised to benefit most within the sectors and industries likely to reap the benefits of an infrastructure program, said Elizabeth Vermillion, equity analyst at CFRA, in an interview.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，CFRA股票分析师伊丽莎白·弗米利恩(Elizabeth Vermillion)在接受采访时表示，已经倾向于“绿色”或环保的公司可能会在可能从基础设施计划中受益最多。</blockquote></p><p> That includes companies like construction-equipment giant Caterpillar Inc.,which offer a variety of battery electric and alternative-fuel equipment that could be favored as part of a Biden plan. Trucking companies could also benefit as they look to piggyback on the build out of infrastructure for electric vehicles.</p><p><blockquote>这包括建筑设备巨头卡特彼勒公司（Caterpillar Inc.）等公司，该公司提供各种电池电动和替代燃料设备，这些设备可能会成为拜登计划的一部分。卡车运输公司也可能受益，因为他们希望利用电动汽车基础设施的建设。</blockquote></p><p> Companies related to 5G mobile phone infrastructure may also benefit, she said. That includes not only carriers and the companies developing 5G technology, but also industrial companies that will be building towers, putting wires in the ground and building out the grid.</p><p><blockquote>她表示，与5G手机基础设施相关的公司也可能受益。这不仅包括运营商和开发5G技术的公司，还包括将建造铁塔、铺设电线和建设电网的工业公司。</blockquote></p><p> At the same time, investor enthusiasm may be curbed by memories of 2016, when optimism ran rampant for a big infrastructure push after Donald Trump’s election victory. Those efforts came to nothing, with “Infrastructure Week” eventually becoming a political punchline.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，投资者的热情可能会受到2016年记忆的抑制，当时唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)赢得大选后，人们对大规模基础设施建设的乐观情绪甚嚣尘上。这些努力都化为乌有，“基础设施周”最终成为政治笑柄。</blockquote></p><p> Plenty of skepticism remains.</p><p><blockquote>许多怀疑仍然存在。</blockquote></p><p> Part of the political appeal of a large-scale infrastructure package is it’s ability to put people back to work. But if the economy does pick up momentum as vaccine rollouts continue, the resulting fall in unemployment could serve to undercut enthusiasm for infrastructure spending, said Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research, in remarks at a Thursday online seminar hosted by Capital Institutional Services.</p><p><blockquote>大规模基础设施计划的部分政治吸引力在于它能够让人们重返工作岗位。但DataTrek Research联合创始人尼古拉斯·科拉斯(Nicholas Colas)周四在Capital Institutional Services主办的在线研讨会上发表讲话时表示，如果经济确实随着疫苗的继续推出而回升，由此导致的失业率下降可能会削弱基础设施支出的热情。</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile, if a plan is enacted that includes corporate tax hikes that unwind a portion of the Trump cut from 35% to 21%, investors should expect to see the biggest headwinds for utilities and communications stocks, the two biggest beneficiaries of the tax reduction, Hackett said. The third biggest hit would be suffered by industrial companies, blunting some of the upside from the increased spending.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，如果一项包括提高企业税的计划得以实施，将特朗普减税的一部分从35%降至21%，投资者应该会看到公用事业和通信股面临最大的阻力，这是减税的两个最大受益者，哈克特说。工业企业将遭受第三大打击，削弱支出增加带来的部分上行空间。</blockquote></p><p> It isn’t only stock-market investors that are starting to pencil in prospects for more spending on infrastructure, Hackett said. Rising inflation expectations, in part, also reflect that potential as does the related rise in U.S. Treasury debt yields.</p><p><blockquote>哈克特表示，不仅仅是股市投资者开始考虑增加基础设施支出的前景。通胀预期上升在一定程度上也反映了这种潜力，美国国债收益率的相关上升也是如此。</blockquote></p><p> Indeed, while economists at Bank of America said they remained skeptical of inflation prospects around the globe, they see the U.S. as an exception. Big rounds of fiscal spending already in the pipeline and perhaps to come, including up to $2 trillion in infrastructure spending over four years, remain an upside risk to the inflation outlook, wrote Ethan Harris and Aditya Bhave, in a Feb. 5 note.</p><p><blockquote>事实上，尽管美国银行的经济学家表示，他们仍然对全球通胀前景持怀疑态度，但他们认为美国是个例外。伊森·哈里斯(Ethan Harris)和阿迪亚·巴韦(Aditya Bhave)在2月5日的一份报告中写道，已经在酝酿中以及可能即将到来的大规模财政支出，包括四年内高达2万亿美元的基础设施支出，仍然对通胀前景构成上行风险。</blockquote></p><p> The past week saw stocks end mostly lower but not far off all-time highs, with the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;losing 0.7% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;down 1.6%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;eked out a 0.1% weekly gain.</p><p><blockquote>过去一周，股市大多走低，但距离历史高点不远，标普500下跌0.7%，以科技股为主的纳斯达克综合指数下跌1.6%。道琼斯工业平均指数周涨幅为0.1%。</blockquote></p><p> The week ahead will be closely watched for developments on Biden’s $1.9 trillion relief spending plan.</p><p><blockquote>未来一周将密切关注拜登1.9万亿美元救助支出计划的进展。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell will testify in front of lawmakers about monetary policy Tuesday and Wednesday. On the data front, the highlights include a revision of U.S. fourth-quarter gross domestic product data on Thursday, along with weekly figures on unemployment benefit claims and a reading on January durable-goods orders.</p><p><blockquote>美联储主席鲍威尔将于周二和周三在立法者面前就货币政策作证。数据方面，亮点包括周四对美国第四季度国内生产总值数据的修正，以及每周初请失业金数据和1月份耐用品订单数据。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/u-s-stock-market-investors-are-already-betting-on-an-infrastructure-spending-spree-11613773663?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/u-s-stock-market-investors-are-already-betting-on-an-infrastructure-spending-spree-11613773663?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1124857901","content_text":"Potential tax hikes, inflation worries partly blunt potential upside from infrastructure spending\nInvestors are once again factoring in the prospect of a big round of long-term infrastructure spending even as U.S. lawmakers work toward a short-term round of relief that’s expected to come in near President Joe Biden’s $1.9 trillion price tag.\nAnalysts have already started to “embed expectations” for infrastructure spending, as evidenced by a 25% surge in projected 2021 earnings for companies in the S&P 500 machinery sub-index since June, as opposed to an average rise or around 6% for companies the broader S&P 500 index, said Mark Hackett, chief of investment research at Nationwide, in an interview.\nThe machinery group, which along with the broader industrials sector is seen as a primary beneficiary of a boost in infrastructure spending, has rallied around 118% from its pandemic lows set last March, versus the S&P 500’s 78% rally. Industrials are up more than 86% from those lows, while materials stocks, which investors also expect to benefit, have bounced 95%.\nNo doubt, part of those gains are down to other pro-cyclical factors, including vaccine rollouts, falling COVID-19 cases, and two heavy load of near-term fiscal stimulus, Hackett said. At the same time, investors are also aware that infrastructure spending is quite likely to lead to tax increases which could blunt the upside for stocks.\nU.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, in a Thursday interview with CNBC, saidtax increases on corporations and high-income individualswould be used to pay for part of Biden’s infrastructure plan. Yellen said there wasn’t yet a cost estimate for an infrastructure plan that’s still being put together.\nMeanwhile, companies that already have a “green” or eco-friendly tilt may be poised to benefit most within the sectors and industries likely to reap the benefits of an infrastructure program, said Elizabeth Vermillion, equity analyst at CFRA, in an interview.\nThat includes companies like construction-equipment giant Caterpillar Inc.,which offer a variety of battery electric and alternative-fuel equipment that could be favored as part of a Biden plan. Trucking companies could also benefit as they look to piggyback on the build out of infrastructure for electric vehicles.\nCompanies related to 5G mobile phone infrastructure may also benefit, she said. That includes not only carriers and the companies developing 5G technology, but also industrial companies that will be building towers, putting wires in the ground and building out the grid.\nAt the same time, investor enthusiasm may be curbed by memories of 2016, when optimism ran rampant for a big infrastructure push after Donald Trump’s election victory. Those efforts came to nothing, with “Infrastructure Week” eventually becoming a political punchline.\nPlenty of skepticism remains.\nPart of the political appeal of a large-scale infrastructure package is it’s ability to put people back to work. But if the economy does pick up momentum as vaccine rollouts continue, the resulting fall in unemployment could serve to undercut enthusiasm for infrastructure spending, said Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research, in remarks at a Thursday online seminar hosted by Capital Institutional Services.\nMeanwhile, if a plan is enacted that includes corporate tax hikes that unwind a portion of the Trump cut from 35% to 21%, investors should expect to see the biggest headwinds for utilities and communications stocks, the two biggest beneficiaries of the tax reduction, Hackett said. The third biggest hit would be suffered by industrial companies, blunting some of the upside from the increased spending.\nIt isn’t only stock-market investors that are starting to pencil in prospects for more spending on infrastructure, Hackett said. Rising inflation expectations, in part, also reflect that potential as does the related rise in U.S. Treasury debt yields.\nIndeed, while economists at Bank of America said they remained skeptical of inflation prospects around the globe, they see the U.S. as an exception. Big rounds of fiscal spending already in the pipeline and perhaps to come, including up to $2 trillion in infrastructure spending over four years, remain an upside risk to the inflation outlook, wrote Ethan Harris and Aditya Bhave, in a Feb. 5 note.\nThe past week saw stocks end mostly lower but not far off all-time highs, with the S&P 500 losing 0.7% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite down 1.6%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average eked out a 0.1% weekly gain.\nThe week ahead will be closely watched for developments on Biden’s $1.9 trillion relief spending plan.\nFederal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell will testify in front of lawmakers about monetary policy Tuesday and Wednesday. On the data front, the highlights include a revision of U.S. fourth-quarter gross domestic product data on Thursday, along with weekly figures on unemployment benefit claims and a reading on January durable-goods orders.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2452,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":360173020,"gmtCreate":1613877279060,"gmtModify":1634551994989,"author":{"id":"3575103913694167","authorId":"3575103913694167","name":"sukehhh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4dddb8308a2c3c9746367f01767eee5e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575103913694167","idStr":"3575103913694167"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/360173020","repostId":"1143100356","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1449,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":360398919,"gmtCreate":1613825893731,"gmtModify":1634552096997,"author":{"id":"3575103913694167","authorId":"3575103913694167","name":"sukehhh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4dddb8308a2c3c9746367f01767eee5e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575103913694167","idStr":"3575103913694167"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/360398919","repostId":"1143100356","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1715,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}